Hi again everyone!

Hi again everyone, I just wanted to let you guys know that I am still on here, I haven't left. I've been very busy lately, and I'm going to come on here every chance I get. I'm 14 now, and have been for about 5 monthes, well just wanted to let you guys know I'm still here, thanks.

Schools Out!!!

School is out tomorrow for me, only one more day to go, so I will be able to come on here more often.

Physical evidence of UFOs.

The physical evidence of UFOs is actual traces of a UFO being in an area, physical evidence contains vehicle encounter, landing, physical traces, E-M effects, odor, physiological effects, and much more. I would have to say physical evidence is perhaps the best type of evidence out there. I have researched a couple of physical evidence UFO cases back in 1964 and 1957.

On June 29, 1964, a businessman named Beauford E. Parham was driving home in the late evening, he was near Lavonia in northeast Georgia. He spotted a very bright light in the sky coming directly towards his car, and in an instant, it was directly in front of his headlights. The object was top-shaped, it was spinning and emitting a hissing sound “like a million snakes.” The UFO was also amber colored and was about 6 feet tall and 8 feet wide, the UFO had mast-like protrusion on top and small portholes around the bottom which “flames” were visible in them. After that, the UFO had disappeared, then quickly reappeared and stayed directly in front of the headlights again, (estimated to be 5 feet), for at least a mile while Parham’s car was traveling at 65 m.p.h. The top of the UFO tilted towards Parham, he who said he followed it in a “near trance-like state.” Then the UFO went over the car leaving a strong odor like embalming fluid and gaseous vapor. The UFO then appeared for a third time, again heading directly towards the car. The motor began to miss and Parham stopped. The UFO spun “like crazy.” It took off and disappeared in a “split second.” After the UFO had left, Parham began to feel a burning sensation on his arms, so he drove to an air base and reported the incident to FAA officials. They reportedly detected some radioactivity on the car. Parham’s arms continued to burn, even after he had washed them. An oily substance on the car persisted after many washings. The car hood was warped with bubbled up paint, the radiator and hoses deteriorated after the incident.

In September 1957, a UFO had exploded in Brazil. Fragments were retrieved from the exploded UFO. This was known as The Ubatuba Incident. This is the only one of the crash-retrieval incidents that is supported by physical evidence that has pieces of the reported craft to study. The pieces retrieved were magnesium fragments, they are composed of known elements, but they do not tell us anything that makes sense, the composition is different from fragment to fragment and from spot to spot. There is no explanation at all as to why some or all the magnesium should have strontium and barium in it. Magnesium that is manufactured on earth does not have these elements, but they could if someone wanted to add them in. The surface corrosion or crust from the fragments in one analysis came out 60% carbon and only 10% magnesium, and there is no explanation for that. There is several analyses by Brazilian and U.S. military labs, but have never been released, but they presumably show up similar results.

Your thoughts?

Case no.22, Great Falls, Montana 19500001

I did some research today, and came across this case, it’s quite interesting.

On August 15, 1950 in Great Falls, Montana, Nicolas Mariana who was the general manager of the Great Falls “Selectrics” baseball team spotted two UFOs, which appeared as bright circular points of light. He managed to film the objects and obtained 16mm color movies of the objects. The footage of the UFOs at closer range, confirmed visual observation of discs with rotating rims, was reported missing from the film when it was returned by the Air Force. The remaining footage was contained in the United Artists documentary move “UFO” and it was compared to the July 2, 1952 Trementon, Utah UFO film, the films showed similar images. Mariana used Daylight Kodachrome film in a Revere turret type camera, he obtained 315 frames of the UFOs. The film was examined by the Air Force and Navy, but no formal reports released. A report on Photogrammetric analysis which was by Dr. Robert M.L. Baker, Jr., and Douglas Aircraft Corporation is on file at NICAP. The Air Force explanation was that the UFOs were reflections of jet aircraft, and was said to be “quite strained,” but the analyst states no definite conclusion. However, the UFOs could not be explained as any conventional objects. The evidence strongly suggests that what Mr. Mariana has told us for a long time is true. Much of the early footage was apparently removed by the Air Force. There is a TNT version of the footage of the UFOs, and it shows that the objects were clearly visible and also were oval-shaped in the early footage which the Air Force removed.

Down below is an attached photo of the UFO, and I also put the link to the video where you can view it, it is not as long as the original film filmed by Mariana, but that is because the Air Force removed much of the early footage in the film.

Video of UFO- http://www.nicap.org/images/montana.mpeg

Hey everyone!

Hi everyone, I haven't been on here for a while, too many things going around, well, just wanted to say hey, thanks, see you guys later.