Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> USAF TR-3B: Explanation for Black Triangles?
Spike
post Mar 5 2006, 12:39 PM
Post #1



*

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 28-January 06
Member No.: 3,533



If this Craft of Something Similar Exists. Could this be the Triangles people are Seeing?







Small Article about this at:
http://seekers.100megs6.com/UFOManTR-3B.htm
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google Bot
post Mar 5 2006, 12:39 PM
Post #


Google Ads









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Forever
post Mar 5 2006, 01:25 PM
Post #2



*

Group: Members
Posts: 167
Joined: 2-March 06
Member No.: 3,743



It could be possible that these craft are American made. The color of the craft is Black which is the classic American color used for classified technology.

It could also be that people are now inventing planes that fit the sightings. I have yet to read a credible report that suggests that any American company is building a triangle shaped aircraft especially with that level of technology. Its posssible though.

But that does not explain the sightings of triangle shaped aircraft well before the 80s and 90s
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Forever
post Mar 5 2006, 01:30 PM
Post #3



*

Group: Members
Posts: 167
Joined: 2-March 06
Member No.: 3,743



Some American pilot who drives the Black Triangles is probably sitting somewhere right now having a good chuckle....
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jetsettrash
post Mar 5 2006, 01:57 PM
Post #4



*

Group: Members
Posts: 166
Joined: 7-December 05
Member No.: 3,298



you guys know that first picture is fake tho right? thst pink triangle looks like a hiarblower of the future....spike where did u find that break down of the triangle?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spike
post Mar 5 2006, 02:16 PM
Post #5



*

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 28-January 06
Member No.: 3,533



(jetsettrash)
you guys know that first picture is fake tho right? thst pink triangle looks like a hiarblower of the future....spike where did u find that break down of the triangle?
Sure the first photo is a CGI image. I wasn't expecting anyone, to think other wise.

Found the Breakdown, as you call it, and a small article, at the web site of the Link I posted under the Black Triangle Photo. There are other sites, that mention the TR-3B also.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
StringTheory
post Mar 5 2006, 03:55 PM
Post #6



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,375
Joined: 4-May 04
Member No.: 620



(Spike)
If this Craft of Something Similar Exists. Could this be the Triangles people are Seeing?


Of course it could, if that is an actual aircraft.

The problem I have with those photo's is that it looks like someone merely took a Belgian Triangle photo and copied it and labled it USAF.
I seriously doubt it's based on any top secret data.

That being said, I've long believed the Belgian triangles to be US Military. I just don't think those photo's are the real deal, or that the craft is called TR-3B, that's all.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
a_skeptic
post Mar 5 2006, 03:57 PM
Post #7



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,934
Joined: 10-December 05
Member No.: 3,312



(StringTheory)
Of course it could, if that is an actual aircraft.

The problem I have with those photo's is that it looks like someone merely took a Belgian Triangle photo and copied it and labled it USAF.
I seriously doubt it's based on any top secret data.

That being said, I've long believed the Belgian triangles to be US Military. I just don't think those photo's are the real deal or that the craft is called 3r-tb that's all.


The Shape described lends credit to the fact that it may, MAY, be the next generation of stealth fighter...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samurai
post Mar 5 2006, 05:11 PM
Post #8



***

Group: Members
Posts: 704
Joined: 10-January 06
Member No.: 3,453



Good find, Spike. Very interesting. Seeing that the SR-71 was commissioned in the 60's, but didn't gain notoriaty until the 80's....maybe the same could be said for this type of craft.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
seth
post Mar 5 2006, 05:20 PM
Post #9



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,190
Joined: 26-June 05
Member No.: 2,497



It`s certainly not out of the realm of fairly likely possibility that advanced black budget craft exist to think they don`t is just plain silly.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ShawnJ
post Mar 5 2006, 05:54 PM
Post #10



*

Group: Members
Posts: 155
Joined: 19-February 06
Member No.: 3,668



I have three theories on this.
A - this is a military aircraft, and is being mistaken as a UFO.
B - this is an alien aircraft an the government is trying to cover it up.
C - this aircraft was designed by the Greys, and they are the ones who assisted the US military in building it.
Draw your own conclusions.
I can tell you that I had two of these aircraft overhead last night when I was driving down the freeway. They also have the ability to hover.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Strella do dia
post Mar 6 2006, 02:52 AM
Post #11


Registered User


Group: Members
Posts: 41
Joined: 25-February 06
Member No.: 3,708



This is very interesting, but raises some questions. The article mentions mercury. China mines cinnabar, the source for mercury. So, what prevents them, or any industrialzed nation from building these? My only guess is- the power required is nuclear. Some sort of fission device. Nothing else will cut it. Unless there is secret, compact ultra-dense technology
for power delivery, but it would still be nuclear, I bet. Or...~~ *

I don't buy it, as stated.

First, 60,000 rpm? Gee whiskers!!! What kind of dang bearings are we talking about? And no gee whiz ones either. GE has a line of multi-megawatt gas turbines that as best I know run at several thousand rpm.

250,000 millibars? That is 3.675 million pounds per sq. in!

I suspect we are to accept this. Or perhaps it would sound like-

You spin up mercury plasma. At some point, you coax the electrons not only to seperate from the ions, but to travel in some very much faster, per rpm. This produces an effect.

1. They increase their mass, they will frame drag space, and warp it...

2. They will increase their mass by some degree, and this will dialate time, and this will...

3. They will not increase their mass, but will instead convert the extra energy into warping space through General Relativity principles, and this will be tantamount to a mass decrease somehow?...

OK, I admit. I'm lost on this one. Look, I've read previous papers on decades old experiments on plasmas, as that is one of my general interests. Using mercury is nothing special. But how the heck do you cool it, then rotate it, unless you pre-heat it? And what is the effect of heating mercury? If you pressurize a gas, and release that pressure (typical refrigeration), it absorbs atmospheric thermal energy- this reduces the surrounding temperature; and depending, will vaporize the liquid metal.

Vaporize the metal, then hit it with microwaves and (depending on input) you can ionize some. Then use either nitrogen/cryogenicly encased magnets or regular ones to accelerate the plasma to extremely high speeds. How high? They claim 50,000 rpm as either the entire torus spinning, or its contents moving at that speed.

I see a problem, and a solution. First, mercury becomes superconduting at a colder temperature than 150 Kelvin (somewhere a few degrees). If they claimed it was superconductive we run into a wall because to try and move a superconductor using magnetics is counter productive. So, they avoid that issue... Thus, we stay above those temps. at 150K. But that leads us to speculate what else is involved since this scenario is not reasonable.

How do you add those pressures, and then rotate anything that fits inside a device 200 yards diameter??? at 50,000 rpm? No mechanism would withstand it!

So, we are talking about a plasma. They could heat it, hit it with radio energy, ionize it, and spin it. But not as a liquid, because mercury is diamagnetic (non), and you can not push liquid mercury with a magnetic field.

I still say, this is 90% nonsense, and 10% go figure it out, if you are really serious to know.

But, it points us into areas of theory, which we must confront, regarding the USG and ufos!

Thanks Spike, for this heads up!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abadaka
post Mar 6 2006, 10:26 AM
Post #12



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,511
Joined: 7-February 06
Member No.: 3,601



Some of you may find this interesting:

MAP OF BLACK TRIANGLE SIGHTINGS (US)

...notice how the sightings are concentrated around the marked Air Force Bases ...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GTOGTS
post Mar 6 2006, 12:13 PM
Post #13



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,465
Joined: 8-September 05
Member No.: 2,839



(Strella do dia)
How do you add those pressures, and then rotate anything that fits inside a device 200 yards diameter??? at 50,000 rpm? No mechanism would withstand it!

So, we are talking about a plasma. They could heat it, hit it with radio energy, ionize it, and spin it. But not as a liquid, because mercury is diamagnetic (non), and you can not push liquid mercury with a magnetic field.

I still say, this is 90% nonsense, and 10% go figure it out, if you are really serious to know.

But, it points us into areas of theory, which we must confront, regarding the USG and ufos!

Thanks Spike, for this heads up!
I don't understand how any of this can be done either. But if you read what is said at http://seekers.100megs6.com/UFOManTR-3B.htm it says this Craft was made from Reversed Engineering of Alien Artifacts and other USAF Secret Projects. So it is not all Alien Technology.

It claims the by Electrical Stimulation it can Change Color, Reflectiveness and Radar Absorption. I find that interesting, also that the Crew Compartment can Rotate for angle of attack, as mentioned in the Diagram.

The Crew compartments surrounded by a Magnetic Field Disruptor and creates a Vortex that Neutralises Gravity by 89% making it Light and Maneuverable, with an Infinite Loiter Time, because of Nuclear Power.

I know a man who saw a Black Triangle, near were I live. You can Hear his Interview at http://www.dbarkertv.com Under Allen Park Sighting. He's an Aircraft Mechanic, and been Hooked ever since. I showed him this. He said it Looked more like the Belgium Triangle because it was Black. He gave a Great Interview.

If this thing can change Colors, maybe he saw this or something like it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Samurai
post Mar 6 2006, 12:20 PM
Post #14



***

Group: Members
Posts: 704
Joined: 10-January 06
Member No.: 3,453



(abadaka)
Some of you may find this interesting:

MAP OF BLACK TRIANGLE SIGHTINGS (US)

...notice how the sightings are concentrated around the marked Air Force Bases ...



Nice find, Abadaka. Pretty much tells us one of two things, now doesn't it...

1) Either these are US Military planes; or
2) The UFOs/Aliens are interested in our military bases.

I, being realistic, tend to go for number 1.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
The-Weird-Gal
post Mar 6 2006, 01:12 PM
Post #15



***

Group: Members
Posts: 965
Joined: 10-February 06
Member No.: 3,618



Cool pictures and infomation on this 'triangle UFO sightings'.

I agree with sam on the two possibilities he listed. There are quite a number of sightings in the area shown by Abad. So its likely that the US Military have created the aircraft. But if you look at how many other 'different' UFO sightings there are, in certain places, they show many sightings too. So it could be UfO's/extraterestrials.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abadaka
post Mar 7 2006, 01:29 AM
Post #16



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,511
Joined: 7-February 06
Member No.: 3,601



Of all UFO reports it seems the most closely associated with military activity are the black triangles. (and certain disc/saucer shaped structured craft)

So far...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Spike
post Mar 8 2006, 02:54 PM
Post #17



*

Group: Members
Posts: 105
Joined: 28-January 06
Member No.: 3,533



(GTOGTS)
I know a man who saw a Black Triangle, near were I live. You can Hear his Interview at http://www.dbarkertv.com Under Allen Park Sighting. He's an Aircraft Mechanic, and been Hooked ever since. I showed him this. He said it Looked more like the Belgium Triangle because it was Black. He gave a Great Interview.
That is an interesting interview. The Allen Park Aircraft Mechanic at D. Darker TV.com.

This man sounded very Creditable, and gave a great description of what he saw. I can't Imagine having a Craft that Size, just 500ft above me. That must have been something!

Being an aircraft mechanic that works on 747's, I'm sure he can tell the difference between aircraft Lights and something else.

There is a Report I found about a man who had a similar experience. He saw a Black Triangle like the one the Mechanic saw, travel into the Boeing Plant in Washington state. Check it out.
http://www.aufosg.com/page132.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Forever
post Mar 8 2006, 04:52 PM
Post #18



*

Group: Members
Posts: 167
Joined: 2-March 06
Member No.: 3,743



Does anyone have any information about this Boeing facility? Pictures, websites...etc? I'll take a look and see what I can find
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Forever
post Mar 8 2006, 04:56 PM
Post #19



*

Group: Members
Posts: 167
Joined: 2-March 06
Member No.: 3,743



Here is some info about this facility...

http://www.virtualtourist.com/travel/North...ctory-BR-1.html
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Sparro
post Mar 8 2006, 05:22 PM
Post #20



*

Group: Members
Posts: 241
Joined: 19-November 03
Member No.: 22



Triangles are ours.
Saucers are theres.
I saw one last year. Black triangle with the three white lights on the corners. It was about 11:30pm Jan. 4, 2005. I was heading south on the Florida turnpike about half hour south of Orlando. It was a beautiful night, window was rolled down when I noticed a black perfect triangle out the left side about 500 ft. It made no sound and seemed to be flying parellel with the turnpike. I told my wife and she saw it too. But for some stupid reason I didn't stop to take pics and video. I had my dvd camcorder and digi cam sitting in the back seat!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th July 2008 - 09:03 AM