Photos of casts at the link...

Yowies are once again on the move in the Kanangra Boyd National Park wilderness. On Sunday 22nd April, Heather, Greg and I made a trip out to Kanangra Boyd so that Greg and I could resume work on plotting newly-discovered megalithic structures in a remote part of the wilderness.

At one point, while Greg filmed a megalithic stone alignment, I went off exploring up a rise, where embedded in an ancient granite volcanic mud and ash shoal I found a 3 metre length gargantuan hominid foot impression. Alongside this fossil was a patch of moss-covered ground.

Greg had no sooner joined me than we found the moss contained a number of large hominid foot impressions about two days old. At least six were still visible, forming the left and right foot impressions of two individuals moving from south to north, the tracks of each individual showed they were walking 60cm apart from one another.

Several metres to the east I discovered another, lone foot impression in a patch of moss. Measuring 50cm length by 20cm across the toes, 18cm across the mid foot and 16cm width at the heel, this right foot was pointing south.

http://www.mysteriousaustralia.com/newslet...newsletter.html

Dont get me wrong, I have no doubt some form of creature, whether it be Bigfoot or whatever, exists. But my question is when these explorers find footprints, why dont they keep tracking them until they find the animals? We always hear of tracks, but that is it? Keep going. The trail might end, but eventually, it would pick up again. These explorers do not seem that ambitious or anxious to find the actual animal that left the tracks...

Samurai....thats an excellent point....if people can track cats and or rabbits for hundreds of yards....or dear for a couple miles....why can't people track something wieghung 700 pounds with a 14" foot print....but like you I believe in all the the above,,,,yeti....bigfoot and or yowie

Tc...as I just said I believe in the yowie and their counterparts.....however that article needs help....I've never heard of a humanoid that was 60 or 70 feet tall....with a 9 foot long foot print....one other thing.....granite is not mudsized or surface volcanic material that would allow foot prints of anysize to be made...and shoals are sedimentary in nature

Hi

We do and others do too.

That is not entirely true. Take these tracks for instance on a high rise-where the only soft ground was this mud and soft moss. How do you track anything where no more tracks exist.

Dont think we didnt look ( I did follow the tracks and they went towards rock-rock and more rock, kilometres of rocky terrain) because we looked there for 5 hours and travelled long distances in between. These area are very remote. 300khs from Sydney. While a set of tracks might be there, its hard to find more when the tracks are in the middle and thousands of kilometres of rocky terrain is where there walking..

These creatures have a life *S* and dont hang around and dont leave that many tracks. Same as us, we might go through the bush but try to track us through our tracks. You have to be in the right place at the right time, and find tracks minutes or hours old, not days.

Leafmould and rocks in these areas make it almost impossible to keep tracking them over kilometres. Not we havent tried. To find even one track is very lucky.

Funny you asked that-a year ago as Paleo-anthropologist commented on Rex's crypto book which talked of 12 feet high Kangaroos, he stated,"that those measuremnets are way out of whack"; months later they discovered down a sink hole in the Nullabor, not only giant kangaroos but a 12 foot tall specimen.

Rex also has a 40cm long giant monitor track-possibly a Megalania footprint-supposedly killed of with the rest of the Megafauna.

Yet here was a five toed track that a zoologist in the telsa zoo? Stated..We have a 10 foot long Komodo dragon-the cast I looked at (the one mentioned above-which Rex copied for an American cryptozoologist) -and she stated that "Without knowing the stride-iIwould say that the track/cast belonged to a creature that was twice the size of the komodothat was in the zoo there.

You might not have but the Australian Aborigines sure have. There are many references to gigantic beings-they even say they banded together and killed them off in places but still some survive in the more remoter areas such as the Nullabor and down in sink holes etc...and huge cave systems not known to us today but well known to the Aborigines who used to walk through them from one mountain to another. One was bigger than a gum tree!!!

Ummm these shoals im talking about are volcanic in nature, they are flows from 3 million years B.P

Where do you think overseas and in Australia tracks are found?? The beings walked through a volcanic eruption- the rain or moisture falls and the volcanic material turns to a cement type, as they are running through them if it cools quickly enough then they will leave embedded tracks.

Well Rex has been looking for the Aboriginal 100 foot high being from their past. I cant comment on that particular print which I didnt discover, but I can give you rex's email and you can ask him direct.

Then you wont like the print found near the edge of the ocean which dates back millions of years that is over 120 cms.