Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Short NASA rant
RWTAKEN
post Feb 3 2008, 04:36 AM
Post #1



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,111
Joined: 15-July 05
From: Down the road from NASA
Member No.: 2,594



NASA to beam Beatles song to North Star...

Hey NASA, please waste more of our money and radio telescope resources. Sheesh, what purpose does this serve?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google Bot
post Feb 3 2008, 04:36 AM
Post #


Google Ads









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Andrew
post Feb 3 2008, 10:53 AM
Post #2



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,778
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 205



They could at least choose something displaying more taste. I'm not too keen on the Beatles being ambassadors for humanity.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xeno
post Feb 4 2008, 03:58 PM
Post #3



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,346
Joined: 11-February 06
From: England
Member No.: 3,621



Well, Polaris (The Current North Star) is a population I star.
Same as the sun. So its not a retarded idea; albeit a stupid one.

What is everyone's damn obsession with sending these songs into space....
I mean.. its going to take 431 years to reach Polaris... Even if there was something there advanced enough, and who happens to use similar radio technology to us; we will have changed a lot by then as a civilization.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ScottMan
post Feb 4 2008, 04:41 PM
Post #4



***

Group: Members
Posts: 967
Joined: 27-January 07
Member No.: 5,475



(RWTAKEN;346950)
...NASA, please waste more of our money and radio telescope resources...


Question: Is it a money waste just to pop a CD into the equipment and play a single song?

Every group with a purpose that will take a long time to fulfill it stands the change of losing sight of it's purpose without an event that brings gets them to stop and remind them why they are there.

For this reason they invest their time and money to events that will point out where they started and how far they got. This reminder is in fact a look back at the road they have traveled, so that they can see where they started and where they are now. This way they will be reminded of the direction they are going and not wander too far astray.

It is done for the people that have been around and may have lost sight of things. It is done for the new guys that may not have the group feel for what they are apart of.

They do all this without reading my post about why they are doing it. They feel that is what they should do and I agree.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
RWTAKEN
post Feb 5 2008, 09:23 AM
Post #5



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,111
Joined: 15-July 05
From: Down the road from NASA
Member No.: 2,594



Are you aware of just how much even a few minutes of Radio Telescope time costs??!! Are you aware that those 3 wasted minutes of music are 3 minutes we AREN'T surveying the sky for signals?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrew
post Feb 5 2008, 01:29 PM
Post #6



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,778
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 205



(Xeno;347063)
I mean.. its going to take 431 years to reach Polaris... Even if there was something there advanced enough, and who happens to use similar radio technology to us; we will have changed a lot by then as a civilization.

We might even overtake it before it gets there.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ScottMan
post Feb 5 2008, 03:45 PM
Post #7



***

Group: Members
Posts: 967
Joined: 27-January 07
Member No.: 5,475



(RWTAKEN;347109)
Are you aware of just how much even a few minutes of Radio Telescope time costs??!! Are you aware that those 3 wasted minutes of music are 3 minutes we AREN'T surveying the sky for signals?


Lol, you should go work for NASA. Get them moving faster.

Oh, and the answer is yes, I do know how much it takes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xeno
post Feb 6 2008, 12:43 PM
Post #8



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,346
Joined: 11-February 06
From: England
Member No.: 3,621



(Andrew;347114)
We might even overtake it before it gets there.


Waves travel at light speed in a Vacuum... So, I'm scientifically inclined to say, Not likely.
(Though maybe, if we make major changes to our science understanding. (And quick; If it took us 200 years to figure out a way to travel faster, even if by then we could only reach 2x the speed, it would be a very close race as we'd be arriving within a short time of each other.)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
rorechof
post Feb 6 2008, 01:41 PM
Post #9



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,485
Joined: 27-August 06
From: Gulf Coast
Member No.: 4,863



Xeno posts: Waves travel at light speed in a Vacuum... So, I'm scientifically inclined to say, Not likely.
=====================

Yeah well… Special relativity does not forbid the existence of particles that travel faster than light at all times. ~rore


--------------------
Peace&Love~rore
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



Tag cloud:

Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 9th January 2009 - 07:44 PM