Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Safe Nuclear Dump Discovered
SOUL-DRIFTER
post Apr 28 2008, 04:14 PM
Post #1



Group Icon

Group: Super Moderators
Posts: 4,473
Joined: 10-July 06
From: Wild Rose, Wisconsin
Member No.: 4,643



Russian scientist have discovered a new crystal mineral that can absorb radioactive waste.

http://www.russiatoday.ru/scitech/news/23383


--------------------

QUEST FOR THE REAL TRUTH
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google Bot
post Apr 28 2008, 04:14 PM
Post #


Google Ads









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Andrew
post Apr 29 2008, 05:47 AM
Post #2



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,702
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 205



QUOTE
Safe Nuclear Dump Discovered


Yucca Mountain?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vetamur
post May 3 2008, 02:17 AM
Post #3



Group Icon

Group: Supporters
Posts: 2,143
Joined: 23-December 03
From: usually Tokyo
Member No.: 129



Sure.. Yucca Mountain.. why not, say the Temple Mount or Mecca? Oh.. because those religious sites merit respect. Indian holy sites? Not so much..for whatever reason.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Castle-Bravo354
post May 3 2008, 07:04 AM
Post #4



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,236
Joined: 26-August 06
Member No.: 4,857



QUOTE (Vetamur @ May 3 2008, 08:07 AM) *
Sure.. Yucca Mountain.. why not, say the Temple Mount or Mecca? Oh.. because those religious sites merit respect. Indian holy sites? Not so much..for whatever reason.


Vet....you have a point there....but yucca mountain and that area was heavily mined in the gold and silver industries so it has long been out of the Western Shoshone and Paiute hands. Also since the late 1940s it was adjacent to the Nevada test site.....so its already heavily impacted by radiation so in reality it is a good place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrew
post May 3 2008, 12:30 PM
Post #5



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,702
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 205



QUOTE (Vetamur @ May 3 2008, 09:07 AM) *
Sure.. Yucca Mountain.. why not, say the Temple Mount or Mecca? Oh.. because those religious sites merit respect. Indian holy sites? Not so much..for whatever reason.

The Temple Mount is in the city of Jerusalem and Mecca is also a centre of human habitation. Both are the sites of historic buildings. I have no respect for geological features themselves as objects of superstitious reverence. If some equivalent bare geological feature had some significance in any Abrahamic religion and some government was planning to use it for a similar purpose as Yucca Mountain, I would not object on the grounds of its religious significance. The facility has already been built into Yucca Mountain, so far as I know, although it is not yet open to receive waste.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Vetamur
post May 4 2008, 05:01 AM
Post #6



Group Icon

Group: Supporters
Posts: 2,143
Joined: 23-December 03
From: usually Tokyo
Member No.: 129



Andrew..YOU might not. But how about the general public?

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th September 2008 - 05:08 PM