Do you guys believe the stories of John Lear and/or Bob Lazar. If you don't know who tehy are, try to google them.

In my opinion I belive in some stories of John Lear, and almost everything bob Lazar tells about his work on an E.T. craft. Bob Lazar's story just sound so credible .

So, what do you think, hoax or not?

At the present time, it seems that Mr Lazar is a fraud. Los Alamos is the only place that can account for him. None of his other claims can be proven, in fact the more you check, the more of a fraud he seems to be.

John Lear...dunno enough about him.

John Lear scares the crap out of me. A lot of his theories he believes in with a passion just don't mesh with physics. Bob Lazar on the other hand, I don't know. He really does have the attitude of, "You can believe me, or you can't, I don't care. This is my story and I'm sticking with it." I have to see it to believe it, but I'll keep what he said in the back of my mind if I do.

SD....I agree... mr lazar seems to be quite unbelieveable.....while john lear sounds more realisitic his theories don't quite mesh with current scientific trends......

for me just the other way. At the interview on coasttocoastam with Art Bell, Lazar sounded so credible, it was almost like he told something, that everybody knew was right. On the other hand though, John Lear's story on coasttocoastam (again with Art Bell, and also with Georg Knapp) sounded a bit "hoaxy" if you know what I mean.



Damn, I want to know, if they are telling the truth

This post has been edited by Area-51: Sep 25 2008, 01:53 PM

And furthermore, Lazar was only a technician working at Los Alamos under the employ of an external contractor, if I can recall the details correctly. He did not attend prestigious technological universities and receive advanced degrees in physics and electronics like he claims to have done. Stanton Friedman, who was formerly a physicist himself, quizzed Lazar and found him unable to answer basic questions on physics.

Remember that the perfect lie is made when sandwiched between two pieces of truth. Also, the whole "you can believe me or not, I don't care, but I am going to tell my story" is the obvious way to start a bullshit story. That "onece upon a time" method might be enough to fool the more gullible, but not the majority.

I don't believe either one of those people. And especially Lazar. After listening to him rant on and tell his story, it just gets really boring. It's like "yeah, yeah. This is the obvious way to behave if you don't have proof because you are lying through your teeth."

Ironically, I think the best evidence for ETs on Earth are the crappy, blurry, boring videos and also eye witnedd accounts. Take my story, for example. To anyone listening it sounds boring. Basically "it hovered there for a long time and looked like nothing else".

hmm.....yeah maybe youre right. well, maybe (-;

Just heard of some fellow that went over to the man made UFO sans ET theories and
emailed Lazar ripping into him for the BS theories he was following for years.