I would like to contribute a Roswell blog for the site, it's a conspiracy theory blog by one of our writers and it's a great read with pics and videos included.

Would be great if you read it http://blogs.sundaymercury.net/thegrassyknoll/

It's written by an award winning writer who has his own conspiracy theory blog, he puts blood sweat and tears into the pieces so would be good to know what you think.

Best wishes

Steve

Read of such opinions before.

The balloon theory holds a much water as a seive.

Damn the balloon theory again balloons those pesky kids lol

Steve.....the article has an interesting layout....nice videos of roswell aaf as well.....did they mention project mogul.....or did I miss that....as far as I know thats what the government is saying was found.

I do NOT have any definitive proof but I believe that a craft of extra-terrestrial origin did indeed crash at Roswell on 7th July 1947.
Eventually, one day, the truth will come out but at the moment the mind-set of the American Government is not to tell the truth to the public.
It will be interesting to hear the varying excuses of the Politicians when Disclosure comes about, by whatever means.

Same here but face it, this whole subject is awash with misinformation. The coverup is by no means the only way of hiding secrets. Agents have deliberately mislead us. Corso was an example.

Stop thinking conspiracy, abductions, evidence. Think UFO is a given. Now start asking real interesting questions. Yes they have or had a UFO at area 51.
It wasn't so big that it could not be hidden. Conclusion, it could only be so big. Big enough to hide.

So the questions should start with, How much air could it have carried. What did they eat. Travel means supplies. How much could they carry in a relatively small vehicle. Example Apollo caried enough oxygen to last a few days once the problem occured. Larger vehicle = more supplies. More suuplies = longer trips.

Based on logistics you can focus on some pretty interesting conclusions. Small vehicle and low or no supplies = Not much time on site. Or not worried about time for return trip. Time equates to distance and distance to speed. That is unless they were not worried about time or speed or distance.

These questions relate to technology. If it only takes an hour to get here and back, why worry about supplies. Can't use our known tech, it would take forever just to get out of the solar system. So their tech says Einstein was full of shit on relativity. Our best tech guys can't figure out how the big bang occured or what happens inside a black hole. The math is not there yet.

Stop drooling over the rest of the crap and open your minds up.

More later

This post has been edited by lacurmo: Oct 2 2008, 02:55 PM

There is another possibility to consider. What if the UFO's that are supposedly seen are merely " scout craft " that are sent out by a " mother ship ". I should imagine that the " mother ship " would be huge and would contain all necessities required for inter stellar flight.
Why do we assume that our sciences would apply to an Alien race? Surely it is more feasible to assume that an Alien race would be far more technically advanced than we are and as such would have their own Laws of Physics and Science which we could not even begin to understand?

Now were talking and thinking. Big ship, big distances. Would it be correct to assume that a mother ship would carry mostly similar craft. Or at least a few for each specialized purpose.

This fits in with the sightings ie saucers, cigar shapes, triangles. Or multiple "wing" type formations

However small could also relate to fast interstellar speeds given they had the tech to do that. maybe they dip into "Other" space, then travel, then pop out.
Space is full of junk like rocks, etc. Have to get around that.

Remember they have to fit a mission. Get here, observe, study, return, report. A mothership may not be directly related to need to carry supplies with for the trip but to carry out extended missions without the need to return for re-supply.

JV....that is certainly a couple good points.....I agree with you.

One more thing that gets me about roswell is how can a highly advanced craft that has travelled across the universe,the most dangerous enviroment known to man,and then when they get here get twatted by a thunderstorm.Hmmm!

From what I have been led to believe, the Roswell Incident involved TWO UFO's. If there had only been one UFO the Electrical storm would not have posed any problems. Don't our own Pilots, Commercial and Military, negotiate electrical storms without any mishaps? From what little information I have been able to find it appears that a Lightning Bolt hit one of the UFO's and then arced across to the other UFO. Because of this " million to one chance " the Roswell Incident occured. I cannot say that this is indeed fact but it opens the possibility of how the crash happened.

Almost as fantastic as the story itself,so that is two, million to one chances happening on the same night.An electrical thunderstorm,I find that unlikely too,we are talking about highly advanced flying machines not dastardly and Muttley in their flying machines.These craft ,if they travel across the galaxy and can withstand the vigours of space travel,with solar particles and gamma radiation and so many other hazards,i can't see lightening doing it.Our aircraft civilian and military have been struck by lightening with no disaterous results,so i would exclude that theory.One theory mentioned JV was that it was shot down..whats your view on that?

i believe that a craft of somekind did crash at roswell and that the american government has covered it up since. i also believe that aliens are visiting earth and have been for a long time. as to wot the nature of the visits are,that is another question?.
i have read many books and looked at many websites and there is something going on which we are not being told by those in charge,why?. we have a right to know and we should demand to know,afterall, it is us who will suffer at the end of the day etc.
i have seen many strange sights in the sky,some of which have baffled and i'd like some answers and soon.

I don't buy into the two craft premise. If there were two craft, one would have picked up the survivors of the first.

As to chances, manufacturing is not infalable anywhere. System errors can and do occur. Just because they are smarter, doesn't make them exempt.

On aircraft we have problems, the Russians have problems etc. Today we have the most advanced aircraft in the world compared to the sticks and rags of early aircraft and we still have systems errors. It's part of the game.

Still no getting away from the fact that the MILITARY made the anouncement that THEY captured a flying saucer this wasnt just some ordinary person reporting on this it was the MILITARY THEY then retracted the statement the big question is why ? also if THEY knew the saucer had come down why didnt THEY just retrieve it and say nothing as far as i know the debris field was in a fairly remote place THEY could have gone in retrieved it and said nothing but THEY didnt THEY issued the statement and caused THEMSELVES a huge problem its doubtful we will ever know what really happened at Roswell

No it was the Press and the local yokels who spun the flying Saucer story.

Yep,

I think its safe to say my friends, that every single ufo sighting can be explained.

THEY'RE BALLONS!!!

DUH!!!

vyrtigo.....don't forget swamp gas.....

Or the hubcap...

...