I wondered how long it would be.....

this was very sad. i really believe the government of pakistan had something to do with this. they didn't give her any protection so even if they didn't thats the reason right there. the killer found her going down the street automatically wtf?

ww3 is in the mist )a poem by Latem.
gods warriors are packed and ready to go
using ball bearings and tightly packed ammo
we do not see because were distracted
if 9/11 happens again how will the masses react?
it is a fact that we are lied to.
what are we to do?
the sleuth and priest have packed their bags
to teleport the fuck out when the bombs turn flesh to ash
we all talk about what can we do
nothing unless a militia is true.
rebel militia is not possible
technology has us policed and everything is plausible.
the stench of death has reaped the streets.
poor only worry about whats to eat
materilism cannibilistic cosmetics.
these are the things that blind us to forget it
when will their be peace on earth?
never because war beats the bordem.
the government uses money to lure them
suck on sand and collect that dollar
most soldiers wifes are cheating and smolder
gods plan failed and we are all fucked
the elite and rich will be the fuck outta dodge.
2012 comes and we will be back to the past
unjust judgements treasons and frags
the matrix is hooked up we eat it like candy
the government sits back laughing out loud and feel dandy.

I dont think the Pakistani govt did it itself..they just didnt do anything to stop it from happening.

And now they are trying to calm people by distancing the death from the actions of the assassin. Now they are claiming the died by hitting her head on a lever in the car when ducking or falling.

Blatant lie.

First they said it was a bullet. Then shrapnel. NOW its a lever.

I do doubt the bullet story. The guy rides up on a motorbike..bomb strapped to himself. Pulls a pistol and shoots two or three times (depending on who you ask) and immediatly sests off his bomb. Unless he is quite a marksman (which is possible) he wouldnt be able to hit her.

Anyway, its just going to get messier now.. and lucky us, Pakistan has nukes.

There was no reason for Pakistani Muslims to accept an Oxford-educated Western-trained woman forced on them as leader of their country in the name of Euro-American fake so-called "democracy".

Sham Western "democracy" is only interested in ripping them off through multinational corporations and promoting wars of aggression (such as in Afghanistan), while promoting corrupt western "values" such as homosexuality, usury and feminism. Why should they accept any of this? It goes against every principle of the Koran and Muslim tradition, as well as making a mockery of the Pakistani nation. Bhutto was president of the Oxford Union - the same Oxford Union which hosted Kissinger, Carter, Jerry Springer, porn star Ron Jeremy, Kermit the Frog and other such representatives of Western decadence - and which denied the right of free speech to David Irving.

Similarly, there would be no reason at all for US citizens to accept a US President trained in Pakistan who had attended the University of Karachi. We wouldn't accept it. Why should they??

a) They had elected her twice before so obviously your take on the situation is.. to be kind.. wrong.

If they didnt want her, they simply didnt have to VOTE for her.

another well thought out post by the neo nazi.

As Vet has said if they didn't want her they didn't have to vote for her, or has your plush over consuming Western life led you to believe that the Pakistanis are to stupid to have known this....... ....

Oh and posting links like David Irving and post like you have, maybe you should go post on a Neo-Nazi forum not here....

A world of darkness...and another candle extinguished. RIP. :candle:

It is apparent that Bhutto was killed by a bullet, judging from this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vq-DwHXx4oI

There was apparently no motorbike and he got very close. However, what purpose does it serve for the Pakistani government to make the claims that they are making? It seems that they are lying, but why are they doing so? Clearly there was an attempt on her life, both by a gunman and a bomber simultaneously and twenty other people were killed at the same time. What does it really matter what the ultimate cause of death was if she was killed during an assassination attempt? Is it to try to say that the protection she was afforded was not inadequate?

I think they are trying to create as much distance as possible between the actual killer and her death. Obviously its difficult because she is dead and everyone knows there was an attack.. so they are pushing the bogus story just to create a bit of space..in the hopes that if people believe she didnt die directly at the hands of the assassin there will be less unrest.

Or they could be just in such a habit of lying about everything they cant control themselves.

That Video is pretty conclusive Andrew, no idea why they feel the need to lie about, but they probably have a totally non logical reason....

December 27, 2007 was a sad day for the entire world.

Disbelief was my first reaction when I just read the news. And shock. Shock at that violence – 21 dead, 100 wounded.

Serious security lapses and the fact that she was murdered 10 days before – and not after – the elections, all point to a political assassination.

A striking resemblance to what took place in Karachi (Karāci) on October 18, 2007 - the day Benazir Bhutto returned to Pakistan; an attack in which 130 persons were killed.

good riddance....i cant believe she had the nerve to play the savior card when she admittedly funded all sorts of extremist groups and the taliban when she was in office in the 90s...

she was a major funding source for the taliban when they were on the rise in southern afghanistan

i will not believe that it was the islamic extremist who killed her. They say they didn't do it which would make no sense if they actually did because they are quick to take credit for their actual actions. This is the action of government or some other orginazation. It's quite comparable to the fbi blaming the murder of malcolm x on the Nation of Islam.

Why....don't you think Islamists are capable of killing there own...?

Unless of course..they.. do.. say..they..killed her..

http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/2007-12/...ent_7328794.htm

(Using a Chinese source since clearly Mandela believes any source based anywhere in the Western world is automatically wrong)

http://www.lifeofguangzhou.com/node_10/nod...148632302.shtml

And presumably Warrior6 you just wanted the Soviet occupation to continue?

while that may be true, those are just words mate not evidence of their actually confession. Saddam Huessin had nukes right.

and presumably ud know that there was no soviet occupation after 1988
she ruled from 1988-1990 and 1993-1996

the pakistani military took pleasure in watching kabul burn to the ground in the civil war...they even sent ISI to smuggle arms to warlords and fight for the taliban. now the dogs they let loose are biting them in the ass. pakistan and afghanistan also have land disputes that have been put on hold because of afghanistan's problems

NEXT ON THE CHOPPING BLOCK... MUSHARRAF

Oh thats clever. You claim Al Qaeda didnt claim responsibility..and then when faced with the fact that they do, you simply choose to ignore it because the Bush admin claimed that Iraq had WMDs. Solid argument.


W6.. sorry, I had the withdrawal date wrong, but nevertheless you are condemning with hindsight. With the Soviets withdrawn Afghanistan plunged into chaos, and many thought that the Taliban would be a stabilzing factor and that they would be more moderate once in power. Obviously they were wrong.. but there werent a lot of stellar options, were there? And very obviously she had long, long ago a) admitted her mistake and withdrawn any support of the Taliban.

im justing saying vet, to what do we owe the media of the world that we should trust them? I personally am an advent believer of only accepting truth that i discover myself otherwise it has no meaning.