![]() ![]() |
Jan 20 2008, 04:22 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 7-February 06 From: Puerto Rico Member No.: 3,604 |
BACK ENGINEERED ALIEN TECHNOLOGY?
One uneventful December afternoon, while returning home on the Pacific Coast Highway,I had an encounter with a aerial vehicle of unknown origin. I now believe that we possess the capability to construct and operate craft way beyond known technology.It is my contention that anti-gravity craft exist.You may,or may not believe it. I know what I witnessed. They exist,somewhere,and man made them.This is my story. ![]() AND SO I BELIEVE THAT ANTI-GRAVITY CRAFT AND TECHNOLOGY EXIST TODAY. THE RESEARCH,TESTING AND CONSTRUCTION OF THIS CRAFT WAS DONE ALONG TIME AGO Go to the link: http://governmentsecretsaucer.blogspot.com/ |
|
|
|
| Google Bot |
Jan 20 2008, 04:22 PM
Post
#
|
![]() Google Ads |
|
|
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 05:48 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,357 Joined: 9-November 05 Member No.: 3,159 |
Yep, I believe that also
The U.S. is light-years ahead of what the public knows about |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2008, 06:18 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,139 Joined: 26-August 06 Member No.: 4,857 |
(TallWhite;345288) The U.S. is light-years ahead of what the public knows about
tw.....I am sure there are a few countries are well ahead of what the public knows....most propulsion types jet, ramjet and scramjet are all at least 50 years old in theory......stealth as a theory is close to 50 or 60 years old.....so what humans have as a next generation stealth or propulsion systems I am sure are quite fascinating....I think we could easily have done on our own.......including our friends horseshoe crab. |
|
|
|
Jan 21 2008, 01:01 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 964 Joined: 27-January 07 Member No.: 5,475 |
I don't think anyone will argue with that.
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 05:29 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 926 Joined: 14-April 06 Member No.: 4,009 |
I am sure we have more advanced technology then what they want us to believe, but back engineered alien technology? Not so sure about that.
Lets say that have found an alien craft on earth, the Roosevelt case perhaps. I think that the technology of such a craft would be so far ahead of us that they would not be able to back engineer it. They would need to understand what the different parts job was, and with a complete alien technology, it might not make much sense to us. -------------------- N eru Hva ml
kvein Hva hllu , allrf ta sonum, rf jtna sonum. Heill s, er kva, heill s, er kann, njti s, er nam, heilir, eirs hlddu. Heill inn |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 06:03 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 758 Joined: 13-October 06 Member No.: 4,981 |
I agree with wodan... another thing that puts me off the idea is why is it only america that has this stuff.. must be something to do with hollywood..
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 06:43 AM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() The Skeptical Child Group: Supporters Posts: 2,301 Joined: 29-April 07 From: Japan Member No.: 5,722 |
As for why the U.S. has some of the most advanced military technology in the world is, completely independent of whether the technological innovations originate with human ingenuity alone or whether we back-engineered alien technology, the United States has BOTH the financial resources AND some of the most creative and innovative engineers and scientists at its disposal. Interestingly, many of THE best scientists and engineers were not born in America, but rather CAME to America because the U.S. has the financial resources, both in the military budget and in the corporate sector, to fund open-ended and creative research.
So we get some of the best scientists from around the world. This opinion is NOT meant to disparage in ANY way the excellent scientists, engineers and innovators of countries AROUND the world. I only mean that the U.S. is throwing MASSIVE amounts of money at research, and that has attracted a LOT of researchers. The amounts of money we're talking about allow researchers to hit their milestones a lot faster. This is only an opinion ... and I'm only considering the financial point of view, so I'd love to hear other opinions, but I think many people might agree: scientists who want to do research HAVE to go where the money is, and the money sure helps get results. -------------------- "A Wise Man looks at a grain of sand and sees the Universe...
A Silly Man picks up a piece of seeweed, puts it around his neck and runs along the beach yelling: Look at me, I'm The Vine Man... Dingo Brains |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 08:04 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,666 Joined: 7-February 06 From: Puerto Rico Member No.: 3,604 |
(BuzZz777;346193) I agree with wodan... another thing that puts me off the idea is why is it only america that has this stuff.. must be something to do with hollywood..
So yeah.Looks if they know something and probably they are preparing us for something coming soon. |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 09:09 AM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,139 Joined: 26-August 06 Member No.: 4,857 |
(kirin-rex;346195) As for why the U.S. has some of the most advanced military technology in the world is, completely independent of whether the technological innovations originate with human ingenuity alone or whether we back-engineered alien technology, the United States has BOTH the financial resources AND some of the most creative and innovative engineers and scientists at its disposal. Interestingly, many of THE best scientists and engineers were not born in America, but rather CAME to America because the U.S. has the financial resources, both in the military budget and in the corporate sector, to fund open-ended and creative research.
So we get some of the best scientists from around the world. This opinion is NOT meant to disparage in ANY way the excellent scientists, engineers and innovators of countries AROUND the world. I only mean that the U.S. is throwing MASSIVE amounts of money at research, and that has attracted a LOT of researchers. The amounts of money we're talking about allow researchers to hit their milestones a lot faster. This is only an opinion ... and I'm only considering the financial point of view, so I'd love to hear other opinions, but I think many people might agree: scientists who want to do research HAVE to go where the money is, and the money sure helps get results. k-rex....very well said.....I agree with you on your opinion. |
|
|
|
Jan 26 2008, 09:30 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderators Posts: 5,152 Joined: 10-July 06 From: Wild Rose, Wisconsin Member No.: 4,643 |
I agree Kirin-rex. But I also believe we have retrieved alien technology as well, that they have tried to figure out. How far they have gone with it is anyones guess.
-------------------- QUEST FOR THE REAL TRUTH |
|
|
|
Apr 7 2008, 07:58 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 168 Joined: 7-April 08 Member No.: 7,413 |
I agree Kirin-rex. But I also believe we have retrieved alien technology as well, that they have tried to figure out. How far they have gone with it is anyones guess. A microchip to a human in WWII would look like a metallic spider. We have come a long way in a short time. We have a long way to go! |
|
|
|
Apr 10 2008, 10:29 AM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 7 Joined: 9-April 08 Member No.: 7,424 |
|
|
|
|
Apr 10 2008, 10:42 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,349 Joined: 27-August 06 From: Gulf Coast Member No.: 4,863 |
======================
Corso also said modern fiber optics are a direct result of reverse engineering of alien tech… Many people involved with developing modern fiber optics take considerable offense to Corso’s outrageous claims, especially considering the concept of fiber optics dates back to: “The light-guiding principle behind optical fibers was first demonstrated by Daniel Colladon and Jacques Babinet in Paris in the 1840s, with Irish inventor John Tyndall offering public displays using water-fountains ten years later.” More @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiber_optics Corso never has presented himself as a reliable source regarding alien visitations to Planet Earth…imho ~rore -------------------- Peace&Love~rore
|
|
|
|
Apr 11 2008, 07:06 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Super Moderators Posts: 5,152 Joined: 10-July 06 From: Wild Rose, Wisconsin Member No.: 4,643 |
It could be that alien technology helped speed the development of fiber optics considerably. That could also be the case for the many other things as well. Proving this is quite another thing though.
-------------------- QUEST FOR THE REAL TRUTH |
|
|
|
May 2 2008, 07:53 PM
Post
#15
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 23-April 08 Member No.: 7,504 |
By the way, most of the technology that the U.S.has developed in the last 60 years was brought to this country from another,Germany.They were so far technologically superior to any other country if their leadership hadn't been idiots,wir würden alle dieses auf Deutsch lesen(we would all be reading this in German).
Even today the M-60 machine gun used by U.S. forces is a copy of the machine gun the Germans used in WW2.I would think the better question would be, why were the Germans so technologically superior to all other countries? Maybe they had help from the Nordic Blondes that so many abductees mention and could this be why Hitler was so fixated on creating a superior race that looked just like them? |
|
|
|
May 3 2008, 02:04 AM
Post
#16
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 783 Joined: 23-March 08 Member No.: 7,324 |
The only issue I have with back engineered tech is that brfore you can build it or make it work properly you have to unserstand the physics and math.
Go back in time and give Leanardo DeVinci a computer ask him to build one just like it. Even with an unlimited budget he wouldnt have the tools to make the tools. And microchip physics, forget it. We could get some good ideas because we know a lot and are learning more fast, but it would take years to adapt to our mfg abilities. Course with 60 years to work on it we might be getting close. |
|
|
|
May 6 2008, 08:55 AM
Post
#17
|
|
|
Group: Supporters Posts: 2,143 Joined: 23-December 03 From: usually Tokyo Member No.: 129 |
Can you give a concrete example of the Nazis being so unbelievably far ahead of every other country? Their rockets were more advanced, and the their submarines were. They had jet fighters first, barely, but the jet engine they used was essentially a dead end and the British Meteor proved to have more potential. Their tanks were good..but not "advanced" really.. and matched by Soviet tanks.
They had done some research on swept wings, etc.. but that was a product of economic style (state sponsored think tanks that didnt have a pressure to make a profit).. but they never developed a heavy bomber, never developed an atomic bomb, etc. Their jet fighter was often shot down by piston engined P-51s, the rocket fighter was copied by Japan from blueprints, their main fighter even in 1945 was the Fw 190 and the Bf 109..the Bf109 had first flown in 1935. There was no alien help there. Germany would have been better served by focusing LESS on constantly developing new types and instead on producing more of tried and true designs. |
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 11:02 AM
Post
#18
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 23-April 08 Member No.: 7,504 |
Can you give a concrete example of the Nazis being so unbelievably far ahead of every other country? Their rockets were more advanced, and the their submarines were. They had jet fighters first, barely, but the jet engine they used was essentially a dead end and the British Meteor proved to have more potential. Their tanks were good..but not "advanced" really.. and matched by Soviet tanks. They had done some research on swept wings, etc.. but that was a product of economic style (state sponsored think tanks that didnt have a pressure to make a profit).. but they never developed a heavy bomber, never developed an atomic bomb, etc. Their jet fighter was often shot down by piston engined P-51s, the rocket fighter was copied by Japan from blueprints, their main fighter even in 1945 was the Fw 190 and the Bf 109..the Bf109 had first flown in 1935. There was no alien help there. Germany would have been better served by focusing LESS on constantly developing new types and instead on producing more of tried and true designs. Their rockets were more advanced, and the their submarines were. They had jet fighters first, barely, but the jet engine they used was essentially a dead end and the British Meteor proved to have more potential. Their tanks were good..but not "advanced" really.. and matched by Soviet tanks. They fought a war on 3 fronts whilst being bombed daily.We did not beat them on the battlefield we cut off their supply lines and denied them the natural resources needed to fight the war. Thank goodness,Albert Einstein(a German) and Robert Oppenheimer(a son of German immigrants) were in America and on our side during world War 2. Most of their jet fighter's was often shot down by piston engined P-51s because of lack of funding and materials to develop them.They didn't develop long range bombers because they depended on tactical weapons not strategic weapons. Bombers have never won a war and have no tactical value. Unless they're dropping Nukes they are useless.Didn't have any value in Vietnam(which we lost) or in Iraq except for killing defenseless civilians. The Bf109 had first flown in 1935 and if Goering had had more influence with Hitler he would have had more advanced Jets earlier.Remember the U.S didn't get into the war until 1941 but it had actually began for the rest of the world in 1939.Germany had been fighting for two years and it still took another four to defeat them with all the might of the U.S. behind us.And the only way we could do it was by cutting off their supply of resources. This post has been edited by tmr3513: May 9 2008, 11:03 AM |
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 01:46 PM
Post
#19
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 964 Joined: 27-January 07 Member No.: 5,475 |
Any civilization could be placed on a scale or level. Defining characteristics of each level could then be given a name for a civilization at that level.
This one is close to it's next level. Any technology at or one level above would be easily assimilated. If alien technology ended up in the hands of the US government the level of the advancement would mean very little if it was too advanced. However I will add that more advanced technology can speed progress but I doubt many of you needed to hear that. This planet is on the edge of subatomic and advanced electromagnetic discovery. This next level is defined by power problems. Sound familiar? At this point a civilization is most powered by coal as the best stable source of power. Pollution is always a characteristic of a civilization at our level. The technology of a disk shaped UFO however is above all this. 3 or 4 levels above. So far ahead that any attempt to use the technology will bring on a host of problems: Poor engineering that can't keep up with the precision needed, difficulty debugging hangups, an inability to vary the design successfully from the original one discovered, power problems, danger posed for anyone that may attempt to pilot such a craft to due to lack of safety technology and false assumptions as to how or why the technology works. Yet all of this is no stop for anyone intent on mastering it. It is just my opinion but with all the recent sightings of black triangle shaped craft that we are seeing could be evidence the US is working hard to get this technology working. From what I have read these craft do not have characteristics they should have if they were in fact alien. Their engineering and performance is sub par for what they present themselves to be. There is something else that I think should be taken into account, that is communication. Aliens use radio communication too. They use a band of the electro-magnetic spectrum we have not discovered. Back on their home world's they use all the frequencies we do but in this area they us this undiscovered band. From what I understand the frequency is much lower than anything we are aware of. So low in fact that you need to be at distances that a planet can not offer you to detect it's wave length. If they do have an alien craft they may be able to reverse engineer this radio and gain the ability to listen in on all local traffic. Due to how low the frequency is, it has no problem passing though planets not to mention low impedance making it so lower amounts of power can broadcast greater distances. This post has been edited by ScottMan: May 9 2008, 01:47 PM |
|
|
|
May 9 2008, 10:31 PM
Post
#20
|
|
![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 286 Joined: 7-May 08 Member No.: 7,591 |
I think this story is pretty amazing, thank you for sharing
-------------------- ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
1 | SOUL-DRIFTER | 116 | 2nd December 2008 - 05:46 PM Last post by: ArKay |
||
![]() |
25 | HiddenUFO | 658 | 2nd December 2008 - 03:45 PM Last post by: Arthur |
||
![]() |
7 | hoodboyz | 171 | 2nd December 2008 - 09:35 AM Last post by: SOUL-DRIFTER |
||
![]() |