sooooo..... does this sound credible to you? Bearing in mind the strings of Nibiru claims we have seen in the past along with the strings of world endings that never happened but usually had lame excuses plus the illogical and far fetched nature of the claims. Does it sound any more credible now? Just because some bloke spurts a large quantity of ...something... and claims that someone else believes it. Does that make it something you should portray as reliable information?
Or does it make it potentially bogus Rantings that might best be consigned to the bin labelled Nibiru?
PS time is often not considered with these subjects. The last credible claim about a valid collision trajectory was significantly longer ago than you suspect. Sometimes timescales are overlooked one or both ways.