Thread: Secret Weapons Now Beaming Into Your Skull

Come on, I posted about this Beforeitsnews website...Absolutely no credibility...I do not even bother clicking on a link from that so-called news source...

I have done a few times but no more.

Originally Posted by nivek242

Come on, I posted about this Beforeitsnews website...Absolutely no credibility...I do not even bother clicking on a link from that so-called news source...

Any information is good information, it is what people do with it that matters.

Originally Posted by Achillesdude

Any information is good information, it is what people do with it that matters.

If it comes from that slanderous deceiving website it is not good information...

Originally Posted by Achillesdude

Any information is good information, it is what people do with it that matters.

To a point you are correct.....as it helps one come to a conclusion and then the invalid or incorrect data can be recycled.

It is illogical to state any information is good information. The credibility of information is determined by whether the subject communicated is accurate and can be proven using objective, valid methodology.

Determining validity of information by how its used is also illogical. It assumes you can take usless or inaccurate or bullshit info and still put it to good use and therefore that makes it credible. That is an illogical assumption-its illogical because of the merits of its contents not its use. Further it is illogical to assume useless information can be put to good use.

In fact what has to happen is one needs to discard the useless information and start again with a new construct and so so it is illogical to build an unecessary cognitive process.

If the intent is to be credible-it would be more logical to simply commence with a valid, logical approach in the first place.

The assumption one needs to be given false information to be challenged into looking for accurate information is only that.

In this case the article from top to bottom has zero substance. It makes no sense what-so-ever and its a classic example of spreading a false story which will then gain momentum and in fact trigger a phenomena that may simply prove that any information that is not accurate-if repeated enough times can gain a momentum of false credibility as people presume it would not be repeated so many times if it was not true.

In fact what we do know about primal behaviour is humans mimmick other humans whether they are credible or not. Credibility has nothing to do with why we mimmick. Social psychologists have speculated our wanting to be accepted by others is the reason we mimmick others. Its also a mating ritual for some.

In this case someone responded clearly repudiating this article by the name of Justin who said:

"The human brain CAN NOT receive carrier signals via VHF or UHF frequencies. If it could, TV's and HEADPHONES and HIGH-DOLLAR STEREOS would have been antiquated long ago in favor of this technology. Technically speaking, the brain would have to have a receiver on that frequency (which is does not) and a translator (for lack of a better term, which it also does not)

Second, the VHF band covers 30MHZ to 300MHZ and the UHF band covers 300MHZ to 3GHZ. Your source says UHF is 100MHZ. Third, UHF only has a range of about a 60 mile radius and requires large amounts of energy to achieve that range, and can not breach solid objects as easily as you say they can. That is why you would see people adjusting their crappy little rabbit-ear antennas trying to get better reception because a VHF and UHF signal bounces off of everything. Compared to the digital signal which is now broadcast for TV it is outdated and inefficient, which is why it was discontinued...not because they want the frequency for something else. If you tune a HAM radio to any of those frequencies today you will find they are dead. They are only used for short-distance transmissions now.
Sounds like a lot of the "facts" you are using have been stretched just enough to make people who don't know any better latch right on to them. You know what? Dutchsinse is doing the same thing with his HAARP rings bonanza. Are you skewing the facts Zen? Or are you just retransmitting a story you picked up from somewhere else?

Be careful what you repeat. You might stumble across someone who knows more about what your talking about than you do!"

I therefore defer to Justin above and Niv on this one.

To me this is just another variation of the tin foil hat story. I know many who believe if they wear tin foil it blocks out harmful micro waves being sent by the CIA, aliens, Masons, Zionists, communist Canadians, vegetarians, Ron Paul, Rue Paul, Mr.Dark, Satan, etc.

Seems to be common sense would also tell you not to stand next to any high voltage wires or limit your exposure to any microwaves, etc.

I think to suggest people sit around trying to plan ways to fry your brains is absurd when they can achieve the same thing simply sending you MacDonald's gift certificates.

Very good, Mika-El. This is why we have such a blind following of the inane, the belief that any information is good therefore it must be true...

You are going to add a couple more layer to your tinfoil hat.
That, or go have your head bronzed.

Originally Posted by Achillesdude

Before It's News

I think i mat have seen something like this on a programe called weaponology,they aimed it at a mock up group of rioters and they had to run for it,may not be excactly the same but it reminds me of it.They mentioned a piercing noise in the head which was so uncomfortable that it makes you run away..