Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 53
  1. #11
    journey's Avatar
    journey is offline Astronomical Unit Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Achillesdude View Post
    I can only find this one Journey. I know it is not what you asked, I am sorry I cannot find a bigger one.

    Thanks Achilles
    No need to apologize. Unfortunately the quality is poor and itīs hard to analize.

  2. #12
    journey's Avatar
    journey is offline Astronomical Unit Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,913

    Default

    But it looks like an object bounced 6 times on the surface before it finally fragmented.
    The sorroundings seems to be a sloped terrain

  3. #13
    nivek's Avatar
    nivek is offline as above so below Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    U.S.
    Posts
    14,428
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by journey View Post
    But it looks like an object bounced 6 times on the surface before it finally fragmented.
    The sorroundings seems to be a sloped terrain
    That's a good assessment judging by the photo alone...

  4. #14
    Castle-Bravo354's Avatar
    Castle-Bravo354 is offline Megaparsec Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    22,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by journey View Post
    But it looks like an object bounced 6 times on the surface before it finally fragmented.
    The sorroundings seems to be a sloped terrain
    journey....images similar to this one have been discussed here before. The bouncing rock idea works if its a small area.....however, if its a larger area as I remember it to be it was likely a chain of seperate impacts one after another.

  5. #15
    journey's Avatar
    journey is offline Astronomical Unit Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    2,913

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by nivek242 View Post
    That's a good assessment judging by the photo alone...
    Thank you.

    Quote Originally Posted by Castle-Bravo354 View Post
    journey....images similar to this one have been discussed here before. The bouncing rock idea works if its a small area.....however, if its a larger area as I remember it to be it was likely a chain of seperate impacts one after another.
    Lacking of a better image, what you say is also a posibility.
    But I notice the clear stain of debris at the end of the line of craters, wich it might suggest that a single object hit the ground five times before it got desintegrated in the last impact
    As you might see, there is not indication of debris around the first five craters, even the fifth crater looks covered by the debris of the last impact.

  6. #16
    Castle-Bravo354's Avatar
    Castle-Bravo354 is offline Megaparsec Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    22,035

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by journey View Post
    Lacking of a better image, what you say is also a posibility.
    But I notice the clear stain of debris at the end of the line of craters, wich it might suggest that a single object hit the ground five times before it got desintegrated in the last impact
    As you might see, there is not indication of debris around the first five craters, even the fifth crater looks covered by the debris of the last impact.
    journey.....assuming its a small area and the first impact is fairly small then I do agree with you.

    I'll try and remember the thread this was discussed in....if memory serves there were better images posted there.

  7. #17
    bart5050's Avatar
    bart5050 is offline Kiloparsec Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    15,150
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    This is the moon.
    We now have images so detailed we can see the footpaths of the astronauts.
    If you get the coordinates and want to do the research, I am sure you could come up with high res pixs of the area.

    I don't give the story enough credibility to invest the effort.
    But if someone thought it worthy, better data is out there to be found.
    Whatever works, use it.

    A good idea stands on its own value independent of authorship.
    If it stands or falls on the credibility of the author, maybe it isn't such a good idea.

  8. #18
    kirin-rex's Avatar
    kirin-rex is offline The Grease Moderator
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Japan
    Posts
    5,675
    Blog Entries
    53

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Castle-Bravo354 View Post
    journey....images similar to this one have been discussed here before. The bouncing rock idea works if its a small area.....however, if its a larger area as I remember it to be it was likely a chain of seperate impacts one after another.
    Actually, that was my first thought as well: a larger object that broken into smaller pieces, and the pieces hit along a similar trajectory because they were pieces of a large object.
    "Dark Puppy of the Apocalypse"

  9. #19
    comfortablynumb's Avatar
    comfortablynumb is offline Enemy of the State Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,836
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default

    I can't find anything that varifies Ken Johnston's claim he worked for NASA. All I find is links back to Hogie and Bera and the book 'Dark Missions' where Johnston first made his apperance sometime back in 2007.

    I can't find a location for the image, but I did find:


    This is a NASA photo of the far side of the moon that shows possible towers and square shaped structures.
    I agree they are crater chains.

    for your consideration:

    ch5.3
    Crater Chain Reference Resource
    Teach kids HOW to think not WHAT to think.



  10. #20
    comfortablynumb's Avatar
    comfortablynumb is offline Enemy of the State Forum Voyager
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    8,836
    Blog Entries
    22

    Default



    Edward Lopez writes, "In your Filer's Files # 18 -- 2010 , of Apr 28, 2010, you have a photo titled "Moon Towers." Under the photo the caption reads, "This is a NASA photo of the far side of the moon that shows possible towers and square shaped structures." Although unidentified, the photo is AS16-2839. You can see this photo of the Oceanus Procellarum in its proper orientation at http://astrosurf.com/lunascan/AS16-2839.htm

    Since what you call "Moon Towers" was immediately familiar to me, a decades-long lunar anomalies researcher, I got my NASA pictorial books out and looking through: "I found a ton of photos sporting the same object.

    In the book "Apollo Over The Moon View From Orbit - NASA SP-362, 1978 NASA identifies as "The caduceus like object protruding into the view from the right edge of the photograph is the boom of the gamma ray spectrometer. A detector at the end of the boom measured the concentration of radioactive materials on the lunar surface along the ground track of the spacecraft."

    -Thanks to
    Edward Lopez
    Fancy that!!

    Anybody want to go thru this image strip and see if the 'tower' is still there?

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/Mi...Herodotus.html


    Last edited by comfortablynumb; 09-16-2011 at 08:09 AM.
    Teach kids HOW to think not WHAT to think.




Page 2 of 6 FirstFirst 1234 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 16
    Last Post: 06-10-2010, 12:58 PM
  2. Nasa Crashing into the moon.. ?? twice?
    By povo664 in forum Armageddon and The End Times
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 10-10-2009, 02:40 PM
  3. Nasa Plans Moon Crash - NASA Takes Next Aim
    By MR.BAJAPANTY in forum Politics, Current Events and Serious Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-27-2008, 02:02 PM
  4. What, something filmed on the moon by NASA.
    By Mr.T in forum UFO and Alien Discussions
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 04-07-2006, 10:33 AM
  5. The Moon (though nothing at all to with NASA)
    By Xander in forum Conspiracy Theories
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 09-23-2004, 03:55 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •