We all see coverage nearly every day on the latest
missing child from the alphabet networks.

On the surface... this is a great thing.
More publicity and alerts improve the odds of finding
these missing children. I'm all for that. Every life saved
is a life saved... especially that of a child.

However... I cannot help but see an underlying agenda
for this coverage.

Other than this coverage taken face value... anybody see
anything that would lead you to believe there's a deeper agenda?

Deeper agenda?. Like the missing person being of some importance to some power? The more people looking the faster this power will capture him/her/....it?.

There's normally too many people going missing for news networks to give prominent coverage to all of them. Whenever such a case is given such a high profile, it is usually because the relatives of those involved exert some influence.

Yes. In some circumstances.

This however doesn't get to the deeper roots of why they
are even covered in the first place.

Local affiliates of the cities directly concerned is expected.
National coverage is something else.

Have the cable alphabet networks always covered these
stories such regularity? No. Not as much as they do now.
Ask yourself... "Why now?" and "Why with such regularity?"

It's all about the timing.
Does anyone really believe that we have a free press?
If we don't... then the "higher ups" who are deciding which
stories to push, and what type of stories at that, while at
the same time deciding which stories to kill...
are setting an agenda as to what the public digests.
What stays on the public's conscious and subconscious.

Anyone see where this could be going?

Fear.

Yes.
Fear is the answer.
Fear is the conditioning objective that will set the
stage for the inevitable implementation.

An implementation of complete control and conformity.
And in what form ... could this implementation take on?

Hmm, I feel it's a great thing all around. Even if there is an agenda, who cares? I just want the kids found, isn't that what matters?

-lord saber

This is like watching bowling for columbine.

You like riddles eh Q?.

Hmmm, what form.....

An aggressive form would be my guess.

I'm merely suggesting possibilities.
A "reading between the lines"... if you would.
I'm thinking more of subtly as opposed to agression.
I am curious as to the tangible form... the manifestation
to which this can be imposed.

No not aggression, Contact...it is much more effective to love a dog into obedience then to beat it into submission. Control the pieces and you control the game. Its been the grandest of charades. Create the situations which inspire terror, build it up until we reek with fear and then step in to save us...give us what we need...what we long for...what we must have...and we will love you for it.

"Clap, Clap, Clap" I enjoyed your little observation: Q [reading between the lines as you say] I’m surprised that no one has figured out what is really going on this forum. Some people step past the line and look into windows that aren’t for prying eyes.

Just a question though, who do you think is really pulling the strings. It's a game of dots where does the line lead to?


.

AKU...if you can ask the question, then you already know the answer...

... and what do you think is really... going on in this forum?

The one you Call Akulmie Watch him
he is different look at his past posts and threads

10 days
he is giving clues


.

Seems to be a lot of clues floating around here lately.

Dammit. I'm confused. Someone want to PM with the black and white. I'd love to be on the same page, bt with all the riddles and drama, I'm now lost.

Someone find me....little drama of my own.

Shield Maiden Explained it:



Not much else to say, but I understand now.

-lord saber

Step in and save us. Of course.

In what form may this salvation manifest itself?
A modern technology that promotes security.
Security is achieved by an accountability
Accountability is achieved by Surveillance.

Anyone see how this can be achieved with today's modern technology?

Well, of course, Q....you're here now, arent you?

Not quite what I had in mind.

This is what I am talking about.
CHIPS ... or any other similiar form of tracking thereof.

Do you see the current conditioning for this implementation
to become reality? Not overnight to be sure... but a continuously
gradual and subtle "option" for people to consider... derived from fear.

Don't think people would chip their children?
Look at how many people already have chips for medical reasons.

http://www.thebullandbear.com/articles/2005/0105-chips.html

http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1413,3...2465590,00.html

If Orwellian overtones have no effect on these people for
medical reasons... would not their kids also benefit from a
a chip that has 24 hour monitoring in the near future?
They already do this very same with pets. In some areas, you cannot
even get a pet from the pound unless it has been chipped.

2002 was dubbed "The Summer of Missing Children" by the media.
Now I ask ..."Why?" Does this give the impression to John Q. Public
that missing children reports skyrocketed that year?
Of course it does. Now ask yourself why was it pushed?
After all... it was inaccurate and deliberately misleading.

Don't take my word for it.
Look at what this says, and especially the quote from the National Center
for Missing and Exploited Children...

"Nationwide warnings, known as Amber alerts, massive searches and
contradictory reports thrust these and other missing (and some murdered)
children into the spotlight, giving the impression child kidnappings had soared
in the United States." But the head of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children
said "the media blitz was misleading, as the numbers actually decreased in 2002."

http://eduweb.brandonu.ca/~students/wint-0...EKG44/2002.html

So this brings up the question of why the extensive National
coverage, and why was it so deliberately misleading as well?

On one of networks... during the dubbed "summer of missing children,"
was a roundtable sort of discussion about all of the different things that can be done
to protect our children from abductions.
It started off with the "tagging" of personal effects and/or clothing
to be able to track a missing child. I believed that as the discussion went
on, the inevitable debate of chipping would not be far away. By the end of
the program... I was not disappointed.

When you bombard the masses with regularity about anything
that has an undercurrent of fear... it will stay on the subconscious.
It is like everything else in life.
Most technology is devised for positive applications.
Something like "chipping" may seem benign on the surface,
but when you consider the possiblility of complete surveillance;
how free would anybody really be?
It is gradual... and benignly subtle.
See how clever this is? It is the Frog in the Boiling Pot routine.

The time is right.
The technology exists.
The saturation of fear has been established.
You don't force anyone to do anything at the beginning;
you give them an option.
When you add Fear into the mixture... it tends to give the "option"
the appearance of being the lesser of two evils.
Initially it is so.
The problem is that in the long term it has every orwellian characteristic
imaginable of complete control and inevitable slavery.

Please, someone tell me that they can see what I am seeing.