Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> The Times article | ET's flown home - is UFOlogy dead?
UFOhunter
post Apr 3 2006, 03:25 AM
Post #1



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,642
Joined: 12-September 04
Member No.: 1,194



(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0 @ ,6-2111848,00.html)
WHERE (ON EARTH) have all the unidentified flying objects gone? Just a few years ago, the sky seemed to be littered with flying saucers and every other sort of astral crockery: strange lights, cigar-shaped spaceships, paranormal things that went bump in the night. Scully and Mulder were rushed off their feet.
Now the UFOs have almost vanished. Sure, you still get a few alien abductions, especially on New Year’s Eve, and diehard ufologists are still recording close encounters of the umpteenth kind. Since 1955 the National UFO Reporting Centre in Seattle has clocked 125,000 reports of sightings. But in recent years the numbers have dropped dramatically. The British Flying Saucer Bureau closed down three years ago after half a century of saucer-spotting. The simple truth is that the little green men don’t come calling like they used to, and they have stopped leaving circles in our crops.


| Read the rest of the article here|

I say :bs:. I have not noticed a decline in UFO sightings, or crop circles. I wonder where The Times got its information from!?
I always notice that no British newspaper can publish a serious article about UFOs, there always has to be a picture of ET (The Extra Terrestrial) with a sarcastic comment written underneath it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google Bot
post Apr 3 2006, 03:25 AM
Post #


Google Ads









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Ben
post Apr 3 2006, 03:56 AM
Post #2



**********

Group: Banned
Posts: 19,193
Joined: 16-December 03
Member No.: 109



They actually got it from me Hunter lol - no doubt they had a read of this - bear in mind I posted it some months ago - http://www.alien-ufos.com/forum/showthread...44&page=1&pp=30

Ben
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mr.T
post Apr 3 2006, 04:52 AM
Post #3



*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,112
Joined: 5-January 05
Member No.: 1,663



Yeah, thats Bollox! how can ufology be dead when im still here, ufoligising.....(if thats a word)....

i bet you they havent done there research! i mean the most recorded sightings for the beginning of a year, was last year! so how can they say that the ufos are gone????? theres is about 13000 - 16000 sightings each year!....DICKHEADS!

At first i thought you were suggesting that UFOs are dead! biggrin.gif im glad that it wasnt!!!!! biggrin.gif

oh, yeah, crop circles happen every year without fail where i live! .......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hotherym
post Apr 3 2006, 01:31 PM
Post #4



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,536
Joined: 13-July 05
From: New Mexico
Member No.: 2,585



It's not dead, it's just not popular. It's not "in." And if it's not the hot new trend it clearly DOESN'T MATTER.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Brad_Coe
post Apr 3 2006, 02:07 PM
Post #5



***

Group: Banned
Posts: 562
Joined: 26-January 06
Member No.: 3,519



Maybe you could put it down to the media. In the last decade there has been a explosion in cable and satellite for one thing, and with this a multitude of UFO related documentaries and such (I don't know about you but before the 90's there was very little on TV that presented UFO's in an objective light - 'V' doesn't really count). Maybe this is having an effect of educating the public into thinking twice before reporting what they see in the skys as alien space craft. Bearing in mind that ALL resolved UFO sightings are of earthly origin.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mr.anderson
post Apr 3 2006, 02:31 PM
Post #6


Registered User


Group: Members
Posts: 14
Joined: 17-March 06
Member No.: 3,833



maybe they want to hold us down (you know what I mean wink.gif) and everybody should thinking "oh their are no UFOs, it was all in the mind of some Trekies"....

I hate those thinks *going-mad*
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
sbergum
post Apr 3 2006, 10:40 PM
Post #7



*

Group: Members
Posts: 219
Joined: 13-January 06
Member No.: 3,470



Maybe they did because well there's nothing else to report besides the war in Iraq and terrorism? Grasping at straws maybe? I don't know.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cosmic Cowbell
post Apr 3 2006, 11:27 PM
Post #8



*****

Group: Banned
Posts: 1,607
Joined: 18-November 04
Member No.: 1,496



The calm before the storm...move along folks, nothing to see here, nothing behind that curtain. Move along...

~C
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
abadaka
post Apr 4 2006, 12:17 AM
Post #9



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,843
Joined: 7-February 06
Member No.: 3,601



yeah... that sounds like pile of 100% pure grade A piping hot propaganda. That is just as rediculous as tabloid headlines. What new low will the media sinkl to next?



Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
GTOGTS
post Apr 4 2006, 12:26 AM
Post #10



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,465
Joined: 8-September 05
Member No.: 2,839






This looks Familiar. I think I saw this with Bush and Cheney's Face, photo-shopped on it. At Rense I think.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
frith
post Apr 4 2006, 12:52 AM
Post #11


Registered User


Group: Members
Posts: 99
Joined: 15-March 05
Member No.: 2,012



Is this British news website taking the subject of UFOs seriously then?

If they are wondering where UFOs went, then it sounds to me that they consider the subject real. Has there been any investigations of UFO reports by this particular news site or are they just making a fluff piece to fill a page? If there has been no reports on the subject by them before, why not? They took the time to make this article which in some ways suggests the subject has investigative merit.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Psykl0pz
post Apr 4 2006, 08:51 AM
Post #12



*

Group: Members
Posts: 114
Joined: 28-September 05
Member No.: 2,939



i think this is due to the fact that most UFO sightings these days are disbelieved by agencies and are put under a lot more scrutiny than in the past.
I dont think u can compare the data collected from 50 years ago to today because UFO-ology has progressed a lot since then and most accounts that would have been taken seriosuly back then would today be frowned upon and due to a more strict filtering process, would be disregarded and forgotten.
I'm sure today there are just as many sightings, its just that the people who record them for statistcical purposes dont take them seriously anymore.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dingo Brains
post Apr 4 2006, 09:17 AM
Post #13


Flea Bitten Dog
Group Icon

Group: Super Moderators
Posts: 6,131
Joined: 17-December 03
From: On a Rock in Australia
Member No.: 113



frith: Is this British news website taking the subject of UFOs seriously then?
Yeah but the whole thing is written rather tongue in cheek... or so it seems to me... I'm left wondering if they wrote that just for the sake of it... you know, as a filler article. They also must have a quota they have set every month or week or whatever. At the end of the day, the article doesn't mean a lot other than it takes up space and gives people something a little different to read. Creates, or tries to create a sensation, a talking point.... Maybe....

All those fakes etc on the internet, even if some of the 'fakers' genuinely believe what they write, have done this topic one of the biggest disservices possible. The internet has actualy made a mockery of this topic, especially more so that excellent graphic programes are so readily and easily available to most people and thus anyone can play around and change anything... Genuine photos of planes etc posted on the internet can so easily be misinterpret as being UFO craft as well...

And many of us are left wondering what is real and what is fake many a time.

Dingo
.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
UFOhunter
post Apr 4 2006, 09:20 AM
Post #14



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,642
Joined: 12-September 04
Member No.: 1,194



(CC)
The calm before the storm...move along folks, nothing to see here, nothing behind that curtain. Move along...

Maybe, Cowbell.
Nah, UFO sightings have not ceased. UFOlogy is not dead, it's just dozing.

(Article (see post #1))
The British Flying Saucer Bureau closed down three years ago after half a century of saucer-spotting. The simple truth is that the little green men don’t come calling like they used to, and they have stopped leaving circles in our crops.

This is rather strange. I would have thought it shows that the BFSB had no dedication, but 50 years is a long time to have a group like this!

(Dingo)
I'm left wondering if they wrote that just for the sake of it... you know, as a filler article

I agree. It also looks as if they have conducted no research before writing this article either.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Dingo Brains
post Apr 4 2006, 09:38 AM
Post #15


Flea Bitten Dog
Group Icon

Group: Super Moderators
Posts: 6,131
Joined: 17-December 03
From: On a Rock in Australia
Member No.: 113



UFOhunter:
I agree. It also looks as if they have conducted no research before writing this article either.
Not only does it reek of a filler article, it also uses an example which is later found as not being a UFO at all. But the explanation is written in such a way, as if to infer that all sighting end up in a similar vein..... very subtle journalism there....

Unless I misread the article, there is no mention of the small number which no matter how much some try to, still remain unexplained. Rather biased and one sided really...

Dingo
.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd November 2008 - 04:21 PM