![]() ![]() |
Apr 3 2006, 03:25 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,642 Joined: 12-September 04 Member No.: 1,194 |
(http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0 @ ,6-2111848,00.html) WHERE (ON EARTH) have all the unidentified flying objects gone? Just a few years ago, the sky seemed to be littered with flying saucers and every other sort of astral crockery: strange lights, cigar-shaped spaceships, paranormal things that went bump in the night. Scully and Mulder were rushed off their feet.
Now the UFOs have almost vanished. Sure, you still get a few alien abductions, especially on New Year’s Eve, and diehard ufologists are still recording close encounters of the umpteenth kind. Since 1955 the National UFO Reporting Centre in Seattle has clocked 125,000 reports of sightings. But in recent years the numbers have dropped dramatically. The British Flying Saucer Bureau closed down three years ago after half a century of saucer-spotting. The simple truth is that the little green men don’t come calling like they used to, and they have stopped leaving circles in our crops. | Read the rest of the article here| I say :bs:. I have not noticed a decline in UFO sightings, or crop circles. I wonder where The Times got its information from!? I always notice that no British newspaper can publish a serious article about UFOs, there always has to be a picture of ET (The Extra Terrestrial) with a sarcastic comment written underneath it. |
|
|
|
| Google Bot |
Apr 3 2006, 03:25 AM
Post
#
|
![]() Google Ads |
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 03:56 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Posts: 19,193 Joined: 16-December 03 Member No.: 109 |
They actually got it from me Hunter lol - no doubt they had a read of this - bear in mind I posted it some months ago - http://www.alien-ufos.com/forum/showthread...44&page=1&pp=30
Ben |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 04:52 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Posts: 2,112 Joined: 5-January 05 Member No.: 1,663 |
Yeah, thats Bollox! how can ufology be dead when im still here, ufoligising.....(if thats a word)....
i bet you they havent done there research! i mean the most recorded sightings for the beginning of a year, was last year! so how can they say that the ufos are gone????? theres is about 13000 - 16000 sightings each year!....DICKHEADS! At first i thought you were suggesting that UFOs are dead! im glad that it wasnt!!!!!
oh, yeah, crop circles happen every year without fail where i live! ....... |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 01:31 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,536 Joined: 13-July 05 From: New Mexico Member No.: 2,585 |
It's not dead, it's just not popular. It's not "in." And if it's not the hot new trend it clearly DOESN'T MATTER.
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 02:07 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Posts: 562 Joined: 26-January 06 Member No.: 3,519 |
Maybe you could put it down to the media. In the last decade there has been a explosion in cable and satellite for one thing, and with this a multitude of UFO related documentaries and such (I don't know about you but before the 90's there was very little on TV that presented UFO's in an objective light - 'V' doesn't really count). Maybe this is having an effect of educating the public into thinking twice before reporting what they see in the skys as alien space craft. Bearing in mind that ALL resolved UFO sightings are of earthly origin.
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 02:31 PM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Registered User Group: Members Posts: 14 Joined: 17-March 06 Member No.: 3,833 |
maybe they want to hold us down (you know what I mean
) and everybody should thinking "oh their are no UFOs, it was all in the mind of some Trekies"....
I hate those thinks *going-mad* |
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 10:40 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 219 Joined: 13-January 06 Member No.: 3,470 |
Maybe they did because well there's nothing else to report besides the war in Iraq and terrorism? Grasping at straws maybe? I don't know.
|
|
|
|
Apr 3 2006, 11:27 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Posts: 1,607 Joined: 18-November 04 Member No.: 1,496 |
The calm before the storm...move along folks, nothing to see here, nothing behind that curtain. Move along...
~C |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:17 AM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,843 Joined: 7-February 06 Member No.: 3,601 |
yeah... that sounds like pile of 100% pure grade A piping hot propaganda. That is just as rediculous as tabloid headlines. What new low will the media sinkl to next?
|
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:26 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,465 Joined: 8-September 05 Member No.: 2,839 |
This looks Familiar. I think I saw this with Bush and Cheney's Face, photo-shopped on it. At Rense I think. |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 12:52 AM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 99 Joined: 15-March 05 Member No.: 2,012 |
Is this British news website taking the subject of UFOs seriously then?
If they are wondering where UFOs went, then it sounds to me that they consider the subject real. Has there been any investigations of UFO reports by this particular news site or are they just making a fluff piece to fill a page? If there has been no reports on the subject by them before, why not? They took the time to make this article which in some ways suggests the subject has investigative merit. |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 08:51 AM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 114 Joined: 28-September 05 Member No.: 2,939 |
i think this is due to the fact that most UFO sightings these days are disbelieved by agencies and are put under a lot more scrutiny than in the past.
I dont think u can compare the data collected from 50 years ago to today because UFO-ology has progressed a lot since then and most accounts that would have been taken seriosuly back then would today be frowned upon and due to a more strict filtering process, would be disregarded and forgotten. I'm sure today there are just as many sightings, its just that the people who record them for statistcical purposes dont take them seriously anymore. |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 09:17 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Flea Bitten Dog ![]() Group: Super Moderators Posts: 6,131 Joined: 17-December 03 From: On a Rock in Australia Member No.: 113 |
frith: Is this British news website taking the subject of UFOs seriously then? Yeah but the whole thing is written rather tongue in cheek... or so it seems to me... I'm left wondering if they wrote that just for the sake of it... you know, as a filler article. They also must have a quota they have set every month or week or whatever. At the end of the day, the article doesn't mean a lot other than it takes up space and gives people something a little different to read. Creates, or tries to create a sensation, a talking point.... Maybe....
All those fakes etc on the internet, even if some of the 'fakers' genuinely believe what they write, have done this topic one of the biggest disservices possible. The internet has actualy made a mockery of this topic, especially more so that excellent graphic programes are so readily and easily available to most people and thus anyone can play around and change anything... Genuine photos of planes etc posted on the internet can so easily be misinterpret as being UFO craft as well... And many of us are left wondering what is real and what is fake many a time. Dingo . |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 09:20 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,642 Joined: 12-September 04 Member No.: 1,194 |
(CC) The calm before the storm...move along folks, nothing to see here, nothing behind that curtain. Move along...
Maybe, Cowbell. Nah, UFO sightings have not ceased. UFOlogy is not dead, it's just dozing. (Article (see post #1)) The British Flying Saucer Bureau closed down three years ago after half a century of saucer-spotting. The simple truth is that the little green men don’t come calling like they used to, and they have stopped leaving circles in our crops.
This is rather strange. I would have thought it shows that the BFSB had no dedication, but 50 years is a long time to have a group like this! (Dingo) I'm left wondering if they wrote that just for the sake of it... you know, as a filler article
I agree. It also looks as if they have conducted no research before writing this article either. |
|
|
|
Apr 4 2006, 09:38 AM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Flea Bitten Dog ![]() Group: Super Moderators Posts: 6,131 Joined: 17-December 03 From: On a Rock in Australia Member No.: 113 |
UFOhunter:
Not only does it reek of a filler article, it also uses an example which is later found as not being a UFO at all. But the explanation is written in such a way, as if to infer that all sighting end up in a similar vein..... very subtle journalism there....
I agree. It also looks as if they have conducted no research before writing this article either. Unless I misread the article, there is no mention of the small number which no matter how much some try to, still remain unexplained. Rather biased and one sided really... Dingo . |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
10 | Yeti | 596 | Today, 12:07 PM Last post by: Castle-Bravo354 |
|||
![]() |
2 | cricket | 171 | 15th November 2008 - 08:27 PM Last post by: The End Of The Line |
|||
![]() |
5 | kirin-rex | 947 | 15th November 2008 - 08:24 PM Last post by: The End Of The Line |
|||
![]() |
4 | cricket | 124 | 11th November 2008 - 01:30 AM Last post by: ravenmaster |
|||
![]() |
3,190 | Ben | 65,805 | 3rd November 2008 - 07:35 PM Last post by: peggy-sue |
|||
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 22nd November 2008 - 04:21 PM |