Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> airplanes without wings propellors or rockets
airlinemusic
post Jul 5 2006, 02:47 PM
Post #1



**

Group: Members
Posts: 387
Joined: 19-April 06
Member No.: 4,043



Did I hear that.

That was some boast that Tesla might has said.

fake Tesla orbs propelled by gas?

I'm not sure what this orb stuff is about, is it alien technology, fake
or Tesla?

Any company you know of making orbs these days?

Fast transit to the Bohemien Grove by the Worlds Greatest Conspirators,
Edison and Rockafella just loved to camp out in the country.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google Bot
post Jul 5 2006, 02:47 PM
Post #


Google Ads









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
ThePredator
post Jul 5 2006, 02:57 PM
Post #2



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,720
Joined: 17-May 05
Member No.: 2,325



If thats alien technology then aliens need to learn a little more about aerodynamics.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
airlinemusic
post Jul 5 2006, 03:11 PM
Post #3



**

Group: Members
Posts: 387
Joined: 19-April 06
Member No.: 4,043



(ThePredator)
If thats alien technology then aliens need to learn a little more about aerodynamics.


That is hard to understand, for a number of reasons.

If fake make a good fake so people understand it.

Promote his latest toy or promotion, I can go with that.

Unless its put putting along as it appears to be doing.

Those alien or Sperry Gyros can keep anything upright.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ThePredator
post Jul 5 2006, 03:40 PM
Post #4



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,720
Joined: 17-May 05
Member No.: 2,325



I'm saying that a sphere is incredibly non-aerodynamic, the only advantage I can see it having is that it can presumably) function in any direction without turning. This advantage is only truly advantigous in absence of gravity because with gravity it would have an 'upright' position (unless it was an unmanned craft with sensors that detected without focus). So I am saying that it is most likely faux or some sort of phenomena (I havn't researched the sphere thing with google earth).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crafth
post Jul 5 2006, 04:12 PM
Post #5



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,018
Joined: 9-September 05
Member No.: 2,846



(ThePredator)
I'm saying that a sphere is incredibly non-aerodynamic, the only advantage I can see it having is that it can presumably) function in any direction without turning. This advantage is only truly advantigous in absence of gravity because with gravity it would have an 'upright' position (unless it was an unmanned craft with sensors that detected without focus). So I am saying that it is most likely faux or some sort of phenomena (I havn't researched the sphere thing with google earth).


Whatever they are, i'm sure they must be unmanned, they are way too small to be.
If not it's from an alien race with tiny little people.

i think of the following possibilities:

-they are the result of some secret-groups project, perhaps even gouvernment, military.

-a new kind of life-form

-alien research probes, maybe an interdimensional experiment where they use these sphere's to cross dimensions and do research on the other side.

-materialized antimatter from an 'opposite universe'. Like the DAL universe.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrew
post Jul 5 2006, 06:19 PM
Post #6



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,700
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 205



(crafth)
Whatever they are, i'm sure they must be unmanned, they are way too small to be.
If not it's from an alien race with tiny little people.

They subtend an angle in the images much greater than houses do on the ground. The imaging satellite is probably at an altitude of 200 miles or more. If the objects were within earth's atmosphere up to an altitude of several miles, then they would be of a size on the order of that of a building, even a large one. However, they would also be in focus if they were genuinely in the scene below the satellite. As they are not in focus, they cannot be in the lower atmosphere. They are probably, as the webpage says, droplets of condensation, or they have been introduced at some stage in the processing of the images. Don't assume always that what appears in a photograph was present outside of whatever imaging apparatus was used.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crafth
post Jul 5 2006, 06:26 PM
Post #7



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,018
Joined: 9-September 05
Member No.: 2,846



That's what i mentioned in the other thread about this, wich i forgot as a possibility here.
I agree, it can have something to do with the camera or the satalite, but why doesn't anybody know this then? Can't the people who are in the organization of this satalite just help us out here?
If there's such an error, they'll have to be aware of it and fix it!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Andrew
post Jul 5 2006, 06:33 PM
Post #8



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,700
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 205



There's not much to fix. They're not going to throw out a usable image just because it has been marred in a very small patch by some contaminant. Maybe if they take another pass, they will get an image free of artifacts but the rate at which images are being added to Google Earth seems to be very slow. They are not the type of people who suspect every speck on an image of the atmosphere to be an alien spacecraft.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
crafth
post Jul 5 2006, 06:39 PM
Post #9



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,018
Joined: 9-September 05
Member No.: 2,846



I'd like to hear thier explanation. It could be anything, even an alien object, until someone comes with some explanation or proof of what it really is.

The strange thing is that they don't just show on google images, but are filmed and photographed by allot of people around the world, even by the NASA astronauts.

Most of the sightings today is of those spheres, and until now, it could be anything. From a drop of water to super advanced alien technology.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Justice League
post Jul 31 2006, 12:25 AM
Post #10



*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,731
Joined: 8-September 04
Member No.: 1,177



(ThePredator;257688)
I'm saying that a sphere is incredibly non-aerodynamic, the only advantage I can see it having is that it can presumably) function in any direction without turning. This advantage is only truly advantigous in absence of gravity because with gravity it would have an 'upright' position (unless it was an unmanned craft with sensors that detected without focus). So I am saying that it is most likely faux or some sort of phenomena (I havn't researched the sphere thing with google earth).


The sphere is assymetrical and perfectly aerodynamical.

Spinning the shell around a core, can also help cool any heat and pressure waves durin high speed, so that the heat is disperesed better.

Gyroscopes can allow the craft to turn on a dime in any direction, but these craft are never far from a mother ship it seems, and are most likely receiving their propulsion energy from a microwave or other type of beam...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Fen Star
post Jul 31 2006, 02:43 AM
Post #11


((( Bring The Rain )))
*******

Group: Members
Posts: 4,212
Joined: 18-June 06
From: Cambridgeshire England
Member No.: 4,543



im still going to go with image error i mean with this many huge spheres flying around why hasnt main stream media outlets picked up on it


--------------------
Nathanial "a_skeptic" Meade 1979-2007 RIP
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Xeno
post Jul 31 2006, 02:49 AM
Post #12



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 2,238
Joined: 11-February 06
Member No.: 3,621



They shouldnt use google earth maps to try and prove to people, Google earth would see the spheres for over 100 reasons

Those would be cool though, Get rid of the dam airines and replace them with flying Methane powered balls, Man imagine the speed, inspead of runways you could catch them in a giant diamond thread net
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 21st August 2008 - 05:20 PM