Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Clinton goes off on Fox News.
kellyb
post Oct 9 2006, 07:21 PM
Post #1


Color me skeptical....
Group Icon

Group: Super Moderators
Posts: 8,500
Joined: 8-May 04
Member No.: 631



http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/24/clinton-video/

Regardless of what you think about the man, he's certainly persuasive.
biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Google Bot
post Oct 9 2006, 07:21 PM
Post #


Google Ads









Go to the top of the page
 
Quote Post
Samurai
post Oct 9 2006, 07:35 PM
Post #2



***

Group: Members
Posts: 707
Joined: 10-January 06
Member No.: 3,453



I dont agree that the guy is persuasive. I think he is a bold faced liar. However, I will agree he is charismatic, for what it is worth. Maybe not in this interview, but in general.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kellyb
post Oct 9 2006, 07:58 PM
Post #3


Color me skeptical....
Group Icon

Group: Super Moderators
Posts: 8,500
Joined: 8-May 04
Member No.: 631



Oh, he's told some fibs for sure.
But he wasn't lying in this interview.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faeden
post Oct 9 2006, 09:02 PM
Post #4



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,338
Joined: 8-April 06
Member No.: 3,971



He's a politician of course he lies, but they are only white lies compared to the current "man in the driving seat" big mammoth bollocks lies.

But Clinton is a very intelligent man, and I have to respect anyone who socks it to the hypocrites at Fox News, even though a constipated donkey could do it, anyone who works for Fox has to have a lack of IQ. Good on ya Bill. Hope you learned your lesson, Keep ya pecker dry.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kiku
post Oct 9 2006, 09:45 PM
Post #5



*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,095
Joined: 18-November 05
Member No.: 3,184



He only went off because Chris Wallace broke away from the interview terms. Not only that, Clinton has been victim of Republican blame for 9/11, and that new mini-series pretty much backed up conservative myths that it was his administration's fault. Plus, he knows what Fox News is, and he knows you have to come in their swingin' because that network is all about liberal demonization and Republican bias. Clinton did the right thing, even if you don't like him.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Peanut_Butter
post Oct 11 2006, 12:14 AM
Post #6


Registered User


Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 24-July 06
Member No.: 4,683



"But Clinton is a very intelligent man, and I have to respect anyone who socks it to the hypocrites at Fox News, even though a constipated donkey could do it, anyone who works for Fox has to have a lack of IQ. Good on ya Bill. Hope you learned your lesson, Keep ya pecker dry."

"I did not have sex with that woman"-Bill Clinton

DNA of the sperm on her dress shows bill clinton biggrin.gif


That makes your whole bill loving comment look stupid.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kiku
post Oct 11 2006, 12:30 AM
Post #7



*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,095
Joined: 18-November 05
Member No.: 3,184



How is it "bill loving" to say out loud that he's an intelligent guy? He obviously is. Even die-hard Clinton haters admit it.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cricket
post Oct 11 2006, 06:40 AM
Post #8



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,012
Joined: 10-October 04
From: Louisiana
Member No.: 1,353



OH I see, Bill Clinton was the only man who ever lied about having sex with some one other then there mate? So what if he lied about it, it wasnt any ones business to start with except Hillarys. It had nothing to do with running the country . He is an intelligient man and he didnt lie when it counted.


--------------------
Whoever said anything was possible, obviouly never tried slamming a revolving door.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faeden
post Oct 11 2006, 08:41 AM
Post #9



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,338
Joined: 8-April 06
Member No.: 3,971



(kiku;287973)
How is it "bill loving" to say out loud that he's an intelligent guy? He obviously is. Even die-hard Clinton haters admit it.


Thanks Kiku. Yes I also added he lied, but that does not make him stupid. Personally I don’t care what he did, yes it was not the best thing to do when president of the US, and even more immoral because he had a family, and it was wrong, but what does it had to do with him running his administration? He was humiliated in front of the whole world, he paid his dues.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Peanut_Butter
post Oct 11 2006, 12:01 PM
Post #10


Registered User


Group: Members
Posts: 58
Joined: 24-July 06
Member No.: 4,683



If hes so F***ing intellegent then why did he give all this shit to korea and iran to help there peaceful projects when we knew they wernt. If hes so intellegent why didnt he kill Osama Bin laden when had him in our sights.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Faeden
post Oct 11 2006, 12:51 PM
Post #11



*****

Group: Members
Posts: 1,338
Joined: 8-April 06
Member No.: 3,971



(Peanut_Butter;288045)
If hes so F***ing intellegent then why did he give all this shit to korea and iran to help there peaceful projects when we knew they wernt. If hes so intellegent why didnt he kill Osama Bin laden when had him in our sights.


Probably because its hard to kill someone when you don’t know where they are. I suppose you would have got Osama right between the eyes from a 1000 yard if you where in power right?

And just to inform you, there is a North Korea and a South Korea.

Or have you thought, that the CIA and the American government want to have Osama alive, because it seems they always need a face to give to there enemies.

If Osama died, I guarantee there would be a new Osama put in his place.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
kiku
post Oct 11 2006, 02:54 PM
Post #12



*******

Group: Banned
Posts: 2,095
Joined: 18-November 05
Member No.: 3,184



(Peanut_Butter;288045)
If hes so F***ing intellegent then why did he give all this shit to korea and iran to help there peaceful projects when we knew they wernt. If hes so intellegent why didnt he kill Osama Bin laden when had him in our sights.


You're right, he made a mistake negotiating with NK because they ended up taking advantage and back-stabbing us. It still doesn't excuse Bush from letting NK develop nuclear weapons, when the whole world knew they had them since 2002. Six years later, people still blame Clinton for everything...

Second, the US has no diplomatic relationship with Iran, so I have no idea what you're talking about. Not to mention Reagan and his administration were making grossly illegal and traitorous deals with Iran, namely selling them weapons. But it's still Clinton's fault, right?

Third, Clinton failed to kill bin Laden, but at least his administration was on it and acknowledged he was a CIA target since the 1998 embassy bombings. Bush came into office, after the bombing of the USS Cole, then proceeded to not give a shit even after receiving a memo entitled "Bin Laden Determined to Attack Inside United States" or something to that effect. Later, his NS Secretary Rice commented "no one could have imagined using planes as weapons." But it's still Clinton's fault...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
cricket
post Oct 11 2006, 04:41 PM
Post #13



*******

Group: Members
Posts: 3,012
Joined: 10-October 04
From: Louisiana
Member No.: 1,353



Right On Kiku!!!!!!!!!


--------------------
Whoever said anything was possible, obviouly never tried slamming a revolving door.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 


Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th September 2008 - 07:21 PM