Is bush pushing a vary Christian goal, the ani gay marriage acts, let look at the Noecons and theocons there is a difference, we only going to tap the top here.
Neocons
“view the American founding in secular terms”
“treats religion to achieving political goals”
“opposed the revolution ambition to the counter culture”

“both neocons and theocons advocate foreign policy geared towards the promotion of democracy around the world using military force “
“But theocons defend it by specking of America as a “secret enterprise”

Theocons

“Deeply religious mostly catholic”

Propose “a theology for radical politics”

“Country is founded on principles of natural law altimetry derived form medieval Christendom”

“Christianity is the indispensable the bed rock of the American democracy”


Theoconservatisn - teaches that a secular society is both undesirable and unsustainable; that for most of the its history the united states has been thoroughly Christian nation founded on absolute moral principles that make no sense outside of religious contest; that the liberal and secular drift of American culture since that 1960s is that result of an organized effort by liberal and secular elites in the nations education and media establishments to imposes their corrupt views on the nation through antidemocratic means (especially thought the courts); that the practical consequences of secularization are a sexstaurated popular culture , the collapse of crucially important social institutions(such as traditional marriage, a general separation of law form religiously bases moral principles , and the rise of a “culture of death” in which abortion ans euthanasia are widely permitted and practiced; that the solution to secularization is to bring modern American (back) in to line with the moral statures of biblical religion; and that that this reversion can be accomplished by allowing the country’s Christian essence to reassert itself democratically - primarily by citizens voting for conservative Christian politicians who advance religion in public life through public policy, court appointments, and constitutional amendments, but also by proposing popular referenda ( such as the anti-gay-marriage initiatives that passes overwhelmingly in twelve states during the 2004 election cycle) which frustrated the tyrannical ambitions of secularists.

So do you think that the theocons are taking over, trying to make the perfect Christian-religious-nation on the earth. Dick Chaney has for shaken his own daughter for being gay , and pushed anti-gay bills. What really going on there, could this be the answers we been looking for. I am still looking in to this subject. Looking in to its back history and where it got started. Could this be so radical of an idea that it is not true or is it.

Should there be a separation of church and state? Yes, when it gets in the way of constitutional right of a person, when dose it stop being that will of the people to the will of the church.

Should there bea separation of religion and politics? Yes look at the first one.

Are we watching a rise of a theocon? Mm cannot tell you yet, 2008 my be the deciding factor in this question

Is bush working to make a thereon? I would say so. But more looking in to need to be done on my part.

You should be scared. The freedom of the “counter culture” as the theocons put it has no place in this world.

The constitution is the best book on earth, the bible comes a close second maybe.

“theocons” by Damon Linker “put out by Doubleday “

what do you think on this subject?

Will we be a Theocracy in comparison to states such as Iran and Syria? No.

However, I think there will be an increase in the use of religion to influence politics by gaining votes.