 NWO: Officialy Announced! |
 |
Alien Ufos > Off Topic Discussion Forums > Terrorism, Politics, Serious Discussion and Current Events  |
 Jan 9 2007, 02:51 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 5,004 |
I never thought I would see the day this would happen, and especially so soon. The New World Order has been oficially anounced. Video footage (CNN) is avaliable here:
http://infowars.com/articles/nwo/dobbs_w_f...ream_of_nwo.htm Lou Dobbs was probably the last person I would have expected to report this. So what does this mean for the Western Hemisphere? Share your thoughts here. |
 |
 
|
| Google Bot |
Jan 9 2007, 02:51 PM
Post
#
|
 Google Ads |
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 02:56 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 2,238 Joined: 11-February 06 Member No.: 3,621 |
The voices aren't in sinc. with the mouths, Its very annoying, I cant even see where its out...Like its dubbed crapply >.<
Hmmm, I'd need another source before i trust this, Infowars is hardly objective... |
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 03:16 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3,756 Joined: 16-January 04 Member No.: 205 |
It's also a report from back in June. I can't see that it has any bearing to the popular conspiracy theory beyond the common name.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 04:28 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 5,004 |
(Andrew;303153) It's also a report from back in June. I can't see that it has any bearing to the popular conspiracy theory beyond the common name.
Where does it say it was frome June? |
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 04:41 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 3,756 Joined: 16-January 04 Member No.: 205 |
It was in response to Robert Zoellick's proposal last June: The voice over says "now, former United States trade ambassador Robert Zoellick is talking about it again," while the screen has "June 19, 2006" printed in the corner over the footage of Zoellick's speech. I remember seeing this video some time ago.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 9 2007, 11:14 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 5,004 |
(Andrew;303165) It was in response to Robert Zoellick's proposal last June: The voice over says "now, former United States trade ambassador Robert Zoellick is talking about it again," while the screen has "June 19, 2006" printed in the corner over the footage of Zoellick's speech. I remember seeing this video some time ago. I'm not sure what the poplular conspiracy theory is other than countries will be taken over by big non-gov, private corporations. From the statements in the clip they allude to that view a few times. They also say that it will make the contry lose certain things, such as national soveirgnty: (and many other things such as a quote: "straight-forward assualt." These guys are soudin like Alex Jones or something ---- now that is different. lol |
|
|
|
|
Jan 14 2007, 01:16 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 29 Joined: 14-January 07 Member No.: 5,418 |
I don't think he means new world order in the way you or I would interpret it. Think good NWO, not bad NWO.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 18 2007, 08:01 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 5,004 |
They even said it was bad on their own broadcast (in the initial clip provided.)
They certainly describe the oposit of a "good NWO" within their comments Just watch the video lol |
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 12:48 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 Color me skeptical....  Group: Super Moderators Posts: 8,529 Joined: 8-May 04 Member No.: 631 |
Interesting. Sort of a weak response to the EU I guess?
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 02:22 PM
Post
#10
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,404 Joined: 31-October 06 Member No.: 5,027 |
(kellyb;304534) Interesting. Sort of a weak response to the EU I guess?
I guess we'll find out if it's weak or strong, one way or another! |
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 02:46 PM
Post
#11
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 13-January 07 Member No.: 5,409 |
why is it called "a new world order" when its just canada, america and mexico who are in it?
shouldnt the whole world be a part of it? not getting it here,....*scratching my head* 
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 02:52 PM
Post
#12
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,404 Joined: 31-October 06 Member No.: 5,027 |
Probably because it would change the dynamics of the world.
|
|
|
|
|
Jan 22 2007, 03:07 PM
Post
#13
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 22-October 06 Member No.: 5,004 |
(franca1988;304545) why is it called "a new world order" when its just canada, america and mexico who are in it?
shouldnt the whole world be a part of it? not getting it here,....*scratching my head* Watch the video again (also look at the map in the clip) - in plain sight it says its form the bottom of South America all the weay up to the very tip of North Amercia. AKA the entire Western Hempisphere You are obvioiusly confusing this with the North American Union prior to this. |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2007, 02:55 AM
Post
#14
|
|
|
Registered User Group: Members Posts: 39 Joined: 13-January 07 Member No.: 5,409 |
(noone;304549) Probably because it would change the dynamics of the world.
oh i see:p just didnt get it guys:p "i know i know, i really should upgrade my english a bit":p |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
Similar Topics
| Topic Title | Replies | Topic Starter | Views | Last Action | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 |
25 | apache.one | 616 | 7th February 2006 - 06:47 AM Last post by: bark |
|||
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd December 2008 - 03:50 PM |