![]() ![]() |
Mar 7 2007, 03:15 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,447 Joined: 19-June 04 Member No.: 800 |
I just saw this article today while reading FARK.com and thought that it was extremely interesting.
http://infowars.net/articles/february2007/280207BBC.htm Basically, the article is about how recently, the BBC has lost all of its tapes regarding 9/11, even in their backup, and how for some reason no one has said anything about it, it hasn't even been on most news channels. What I want to know is, if this is true, then there is definately some sort of conspiracy going on regarding the tapes and the actual event. I don't know much about how credible the website is or anything, but what do you all think about something like this happening? |
|
|
|
| Google Bot |
Mar 7 2007, 03:15 PM
Post
#
|
![]() Google Ads |
|
|
|
|
Mar 7 2007, 08:59 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 396 Joined: 19-April 06 Member No.: 4,043 |
Go to New York City TV stations, they were saying the building
was going down. It didn't happen right away. How the fires started and what the damage was was never explained. If it was built the same way as the towers I guess thats a first cause. |
|
|
|
Mar 7 2007, 10:02 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,933 Joined: 14-January 04 Member No.: 197 |
I can't remember the name of the video, but it's number one in video.google.com for "WTC"
Near the end, a man is heard talking to dispatch and is screaming that explosions are taking place some 10 seconds prior then you hear a shriek from the man and then the building goes down. really sad actually. Some say the explosion sounds were that of the truss snapping. Also, what I found most interesting was when they interviewed a demolition crew, the crew explained how they cut I beams (H beams?) before planting the demolition explosives, that they cut the beams at a 45 degree angle. Well, in the aftermath of 9/11, you clearly see the beams looking as if they were cut with a welders torch at a perfect 45 degree angle. Sup with that? |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2007, 06:58 AM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,541 Joined: 1-November 05 From: U.K. Member No.: 3,115 |
Could it be the Loose Change video Trog
-------------------- '' Open the pod bay doors HAL ''
|
|
|
|
Mar 8 2007, 07:01 AM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 964 Joined: 27-January 07 Member No.: 5,475 |
There is an unfortunate fact in this world. It is that the worse something gets, the more little problems and messed up situations HAD to be involved.
It is really quite simple, allot of little errors and wrongnesses add up to a big error or wrongness. This is such fact that you can now blind yourself to the rest of the world and still have a good idea what happened. Take Titanic, poor metal, poor adherence to known design rules, poor captaining, poor crew emergency response, on and on. All add up to the really big catastrophe. 9/11 is on such a scale that it boggles the mind. The number of errors that add up to this are so outrages that the government is in treason as regards to their jobs. Whether staged by them or simply twisted to hide these errors, you simply can not get passed the fact that you are not getting the facts. It is no surprise that information is being made scarce, it takes quite a collection of errors to make this happen, so it takes quite a jobe to keep them from being known. I hate to tell you the government is in some conspiracy, as I don't think it is all accurate, but if you think our government is staffed by people that are saints, you do not deserve to be alive. Not every one on our government is evil, but some must, by the rules of humanity, be working really hard on it. It is unfortunate that the true extent of such effort could very well be as black as it would take to pull something like this off. To hide all this, you must pull any evidence other wise. By suffocating the truth. Thus you can know what had to happen, but not how. The fact that this footage could have vanished is simply more errors and wrongnesses that are standing out like a beacon at night saying that it is the tip of a very big iceberg. I hate to point the fingure at anyone without clear fact, so I will not, but the magnitude of 9/11 is so large that the iceberg MUST have ALLOT under the surface. If we should ever find out what happend, it will reveal treason, enough to equal the size and magnatude of 9/11 and the events that followed. |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2007, 11:19 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,933 Joined: 14-January 04 Member No.: 197 |
(oskar;308665) Could it be the Loose Change video Trog No... lose change may have used the same sound patch as well but, it wasn't lose change. Well it dropped to second place but it's called 9/11 Mysteries It's really good. Its 90 minutes so bookmark it and watch it before going to bed. http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-6...483512003&q=wtc |
|
|
|
Mar 8 2007, 04:05 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,933 Joined: 14-January 04 Member No.: 197 |
OMG.. Im dense today> i just posted 9/11 relating to BBC. Dingo can merge them. Sorry. Anyways, The Anchor guy is talking to a female reporter and there behind her is the solomon brothers building as the Anchorman and the reporter are talking about how it collasped. This goes on for 25 minutes before the building actually collasps. Is this the video you're talking about friedbats?
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2007, 10:29 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 396 Joined: 19-April 06 Member No.: 4,043 |
This one is starting out well.
http://thebiggestsecretpict.online.fr/nwo.htm That page has pictures on every conspiracy. UFO by the second tower crash is weird. Not too many ovals around except in China UFO videos on YouTube. Wow 2 million views, just about. FEMA helicopters radioing in the detonations? Add that to the controsersy. |
|
|
|
Mar 9 2007, 11:30 AM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 119 Joined: 1-March 07 Member No.: 5,580 |
ummm...Airlinemusic....the website you left us was pretty idiotic with many mistakes
|
|
|
|
Mar 9 2007, 12:17 PM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 396 Joined: 19-April 06 Member No.: 4,043 |
Yeah its all over the place.
This film is good, still watching. Who or what was being pulled on WTC 7? Time 58 min to 58:40 + shows that one going down just like the rest of them. Was the WTC wired for computers because top to bottom demolition is quite new. Well you need a top excuse. Those squibs and shaped charges muse have been in there long time. Or a lot of electrical closet work was being done over the years. |
|
|
|
Mar 14 2007, 09:55 AM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 4,933 Joined: 14-January 04 Member No.: 197 |
on WTC7, in a closeup shot, You can see the top of the building drop nearly 5 or 10 seconds before it completly goes. There is that little square area at the top of the building and it just drops about half a floor then pauses for what seems like a good 6 or 7 seconds before crimping then collapsing. Was it just the support beams giving way or was something else going on? It does have that classic M shape crimp that occures in demolitions. I don't know if any of you are old enough to remember the classic MTV commercial (US) where they use the classic *M* shape of a demolition as their logo. I just find it kind of funny in a dark sort of way that this is being pointed out about WTC7.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
| Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 2nd December 2008 - 10:46 PM |