See people, given enough time... and someone who is actually willing to do the investigating... some of this paranormal stuff can actually be explained.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/US/11/02/chupacabra.ap/index.html

They mention in this article that they are still trying to find out why the coyote lost its hair... I still think it is mange.

At any rate, this just proves that all things are explainable to me.

To me, not all things are explainable. You can rationalize any thing to a point that it makes sense. So, therefore you have your answer that is acceptable to you. In regards to this chupacabra animal, I always felt it was a dog .But it still doesnt answer exactly what other people see that they call the chupacabra. We one day will maybe get the answer of what it is.

So much for this critter. Definately a coyote.
Though honestly. I do not see how a coyote or any other ordinary creature could be accused of all the things the Chupacabra has been described to do.
It still lurks....somewhere.

It was always obvious in was a dog or similar to me. I remember the original post somewhere in here? I found it a little cringe worthy that the woman who found it so openly claimed it to be 'El Chupacabra' - nothing like a bit of publicity I suppose!

The whole chubacabra legend still is a mystery to me though. There are so many wierd things that people report happening to their animals.

Coyotes, dogs etc can't suck the blood out of an animal leaving it almost bloodless without spilling a drop of blood anywhere? Some animals are found skinned too, which MAYBE a dog/coyote could do but I find highly unlikely.

Bizarro...

The chupacabras I have seen "catch" photos of lately are usually some poor creature with mange. I tried to post the recent "Is it Bigfoot?" photo which came out this week. Many say it's an ill, underweight bear with mange.

That picture on the site looks nothing like what people have claimed it looked like?