Hey all, new to the site, some interesting stuff that makes you think!!

Any way im sure this has been seen before, i just could not find it in the archives.
What is peoples opinions on this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I97miIH4Gno&feature=related

Wow. Some blobs in infrared. Others here will probably groan, but the first two objects do look like hot air balloons, what with the apparent hanging baskets.

Without even clicking on the youtube link, I think I'll pass

Red glowing lights are nice, but I have my beer to attend to :tease:

[popcorn]

Mmmm....
I like drinking beer too!!!
You just made me go grab an ice cold one!!!

That video was brought up & shown on another thread some time ago.
They were discovered to be objects on the ground.
Because they picked them up on their scopes they assumed they were airborne.

I bet you that it was the American goverment that come up with them being objects on the ground?

No it wasn't.
It was their flight crew chief, if I remember correctly.

Yes I remember this one on a doco somewhere. It looked very convincing for a while but the final explanation was pretty believable. I think it was a huge factor some kms behind the mountains form memory, or something like that anyway.

They sure look to be airborne and at cloud level.. the way they float along doesnt look to be anything
traveling on the ground.. one even splits into two... and obviously we arent gonna be told they are
alien's maybe its the cia drug running with their secret toys..

I argued against a mundane explanation for a while myself.
I will see if I can find that old thread.

This video was discussed on two other threads.

http://www.alien-ufos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=14939

http://www.alien-ufos.com/forum/showthread.php?t=15583

How these objects were ever said to be stationary and a 100 miles away is crazy


looking at how the camera has to constantly pan tells that these objects are clearly traveling and at a speed greater than that of the plane.. if they were stationary objects 100 miles away the camera shouldnt need panning.. but it does.. constantly.. theres a point were the camera stops panning
for a second and the object carrys on moving along to the right.. then the camera pans to catch the object back up again.. if that was a stationary object it wouldnt be traveling on ahead and in the same dirction that the plane is traveling in



watch the camera paning..


http://s89.photobucket.com/albums/k205/Buz...XAF-UFOswmv.flv

Guys, please, the objects in these videos were identified as natural gas fires atop off-shore oil drilling rigs a long time ago.

Here is a link to an exhaustive investigation into the sighting:

http://www.alcione.org/FAM/REFERENCE_DATA.html

S

Yes, and some of the them were trucks on a highway.
Read through the other thread links I posted.
You will see the explanations.

This clip shows the objects moving by the top layer cloud at a much faster rate.. did the clouds
suddenly speed up or did the objects...


http://s89.photobucket.com/albums/k205/Buz...AF-UFOsXvid.flv

How does 3 oil wells suddenly become 4 within seconds....

http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k205/BuzZz777/MXAF01.jpg

Distance between objects taken seconds apart dont even match..

http://i89.photobucket.com/albums/k205/BuzZz777/MXAF02.jpg

Buzz, you have to remember that the clip was taken from an aircraft moving in an unknown course and direction. You then have clouds at an unknown distance that are also moving with unknown direction and speed. So you have a lot of motion in the frame that the eye imparts to the objects. However, the objects aren't moving - everything else is.

S

Those oil wells are burning off clouds of very hot smoke.. why doesnt that show on the FLIR
camera.. and yet it detects a reflection of the flame on the water... i dont get that one..


its a tricky one and the oil well explanation sounds good... but does it truely explain it..

i still dont know

The real proof in the pudding would be that the Mexican Air Force repeat the flight and release the results. If they have done so, they have certainly never made the results public. My personal feeling is that they did repeat the flight and did in fact observe the exact same lights. After going so far out on a limb with the original footage, they are now embarrassed and have decided to say nothing.

S