I apologize in advance I posted in the wrong forum but I am wondering if anyone is familiar with Dan Burisch?
Here is an interview with Dan on Project Camelot:
http://www.projectcamelot.org/dan_burisch.html

and here is his website:http://eaglesdisobey.net/

Is this guy for real?

I do not believe his BS.

X2

Yes he certainly is. I have since done some research on him and found him to be a hoax. Carry on.

dito

Just a poor guy and his "girlfriend" trying to seek attention.

He was a guest on the Kevin Smith Show on (Tuesday 6th May 2008) I am just listening to it as I type this. Go to 'The Kevin Smith show' website to listen to last nights show. Dr. Marcia McDowell is also a guest as well. Download podcasts of the show to listen to some great interviews on UFO's and Aliens.

I know Dan as I have spoken with him a couple of times in person. He is a fine gentleman and he speaks the truth as he knows it and/or has experienced it. He is very compassionate and forward in his demeanor. As another individual has said, his life has been lived with many difficulties but most of these difficulties came about due to his chosen line of work and his desire for the betterment of mankind. There are those who'd wish for him to be belittled and not believed and it is clear that these 'forces' or 'Powers that Be' have, indeed, succeeded at least in part. It seems as if the multitudes of those who need spoon feeding and a rather large bus to come upon them before realizing how wrong they are sit in their armchairs and call him a Bull Pooper when they have no clue who the man really is nor what it is that he is actually talking about. Sheep(le) at their best behave this way and it is what is expected by TPTB. BRAVO!

Dan's so called 'stories' are backed up by others of 'integrity' and 'honesty'. Takes a little research. That means to get out and find those who say this or that and talk to them if you can. Make your choices in whom and what to believe wisely. Don't discount people with 'Disclosure' issues out of turn without thoroughly investigating first. Everything, at this time, is SIGNIFICANT whether it be ALL True or just partially so. Truth is often relative to the individual seeking it. It is also relative to ones own experiences, this is why it is said: Don't judge a man until you've walked a mile in his moccasins/shoes.

PEACE all.

George Knapp, Investigative Reporter CBS Eyewitness News: “Dan Burisch is a smart guy and this is an interesting story, which a lot of people seem to believe.
We think it is sorely lacking in verifiable evidence.
If any surfaces, we'd like to see it.” (ME too!!! Lol ~rore)

“What about his PHD? Burisch says he earned his doctorate in 1990 at Stony Brook University in New York.
The school says he was never a student there.
Burisch says his records were erased.
But at the time he supposedly earned his degree in New York, records show, he had a full time job in Las Vegas as a parole officer.”

Bob Lazar: "This is the biggest bull***t story I have ever heard in my life. Anybody that actually believes this guy should be ashamed of themselves.
I never worked at Tonopah.
I never met this knucklehead," lmao

More @ http://www.lasvegasnow.com/Global/story.asp?S=4190378

Here is some more recent information on Dan Burisch.

http://www.jerrypippin.com/UFO_Files_b-files.htm

As far as 'verifiable' evidence goes the subjects discussed are not completely to be disclosed to the general public. All those on this forum and George Knapp are just that, the general public. WAKE UP! To say we have 'Star Gate' technology is one thing but to than go and 'explain' it and give verifiable evidence to the GENERAL PUBLIC is the same as saying to the WORLD, here.... have a look and create one yourselves. It's not going to happen that way at all. Anyone who has been in the Military in ANY capacity should be well aware of this FACT but that's me and I cannot speak for anyone here, but if you were in the Military you will be well aware of the 'need to know' nature of certain things.

For anyone to continually INSIST on seeing a piece of paper indicating a PHD is nothing short of anal retentive ignorance! These things are all too easily eliminated. People are made invisible every single day in witness protection programs. The people are still around but the PAPER TRAIL has been eliminated and/or even manipulated to show a death certificate etc. In this case the elimination of documents was done to 'discredit' an individual.

Bob Lazar heard rumors and repeated them. PERIOD. His background is even 'sketchier' than Dan's is claimed to be and I never heard Dan say that he'd met Bob Lazar at all? So what gives with that info? There are many people who put words into other peoples mouths for their own selfish purposes. Most of what you read online comes from THIRD PARTIES so it is not ALWAYS accurate.

More information on things can be found here: http://www.astrosciences.info/Aquarius.htm

This Country is still free and you can BELIEVE as you choose. That's up to you. Laugh it up and laugh it long and hard!! That's the best medicine after all!

Dan is a bigger BS artist than Steven Greer. All talk, and no real substance. MJ 12 my left toe. If he honestly believes who he says he is he needs to be committed.

TU posts: All those on this forum and George Knapp are just that, the general public
======================

How would you know about who’s who on this forum bub?

You have any proof at all that Dan Boorisch speaks the truth? Or are you just an infatuated believer of his? You know, like a cult follower…

Boorisch is making the claims so he better provide the goods.
Until he does and the fact he is already caught in some lies leads me to think he is just trying to cash in on the UFO gig thing.

He’s not the first of his kind to find his way to this board. Maybe try and sell some DVD’s you know…

All talk and no substance. Yeah, I’ll buy that for a dollar… ~rore

callmecg,

You respectfully requested information as to whether or not anybody was aware of Dan Burisch. I have provided my 2 cents here as I am WELL AWARE of him.

rore,



People can be 'seen' by their writing style and what they say. An individual's 'style' tells a great deal. There's not much more than the typical adolescent banter here with an exception of the legitimate question of callmecg. This is indicative of the General Public. I see you've used the term 'bub'. I take this as a 'masculine' blurb that indicates that one may be addressing a 'male' individual. I'm a female so that term is rather inappropriate even if meant as a derogatory one.



There is NO MONEY in the UFO gig. It is very obvious that you actually know very little about Dan Burisch since he's long since gone far BEYOND the UFO gig. As a matter of fact he's more 'experienced' with the J-Rod than any supposed UFO. He is a microbiologist / scientist. He's since gone beyond even that aspect of the entire picture. Any of the GOODS that anyone else had better supply have already been supplied to those who would understand and accept them.



Has Dan Burisch posted to this board himself? I've only just read this one single thread. Somehow I don't think that's the fact. He's not one for Self Promotion despite those who would suggest that. I am most certainly NOT promoting anything. I am just answering a question asked by another member. I put the link in with the DVD for more information ONLY. It's no matter whether or not the link I provided has anything to do with anything for sale. If you don't want it don't buy it and that was never the intent anyway. I, personally, have NO connection to Dan Bursich except for having the pleasure to have met him and the honor of calling him 'friend'.



There is NO CULT connected to Dan Burisch. That is an ignorant fallacy with absolutely NO bearing in any venue. If you are a UFO researcher you've probably heard the name of Bill Uhouse? If not then he was the individual who did 'back engineering' on a flying disk in an effort to create a 'simulator' for our use. He corresponded with a 'grey' whom was called J-Rod. This is the same type of being whom Dan Burisch did research and tissue sampling from. Bill Uhouse's son is my husband. The stories he tells about J-Rod have been verified and corroborated by Dan Burisch without prompting. There are no 'story tellers' here. Information has come from perfectly sane and honest sources. That is all the PROOF that I need. If you need more than that is YOUR burden alone.

Here's wishing you ALL find what your seeking.

PEACE

An organization this secret employs a loose cannon like this guy? They would have terminated or imprisoned him. He is BS all the way and many of his bits of information are from sci fi. Sure he is a nice guy. Con men always are.

TU posts: I have provided my 2 cents here as I am WELL AWARE of him.
================

Yes TU and your two cents leads directly to a man who is trying to sell sci-fi as reality via DVDs and Books.

You say there is no money in the UFO phenom?
You are wrong again. There are enough people in the World who want to believe that will keep people like DB in beer and chips.

Btw: Your assumption that I used the word ‘bub’ to describe a gender is wrong also. Bub=Buddy=comrade/chum/pal. Pal=Accomplice and I think you may be an accomplice of DB‘s.

There’s really no sense in discussing the validity of DB’s claims with someone who ignores the known data regarding him and has a personal interest in the success of this story being taken as truth.
You are married to the son of yet another man (Bill U) claiming insider info regarding UFO back engineering who cannot validate his claim.
Your husband’s father also stated that by the year 2003 there will be major disclosures regarding these claims of his.
2003 has come and gone and no big disclosure.
This claim of his is now verifiably false so why should I believe the other claims of his, like he was in on secret alien technology and he met an Alien named J-Rod?
Yes TU, I think you are biased in this case

I think I have a pretty good idea of what the military is about and an even better idea of what the Intelligence Community would do if DB were telling the truth.

Imo, he would probably be arrested for breach of contract, considered a threat to National Security and ‘muzzled’ as you might put it.

TU, making statements like “There's not much more than the typical adolescent banter here (at AU)” is a flame and most of us adults know the reason for flaming like this is because the ‘flamer’ is trying to obfuscate facts with rhetoric. ~rore

This post has been edited by rorechof: Aug 4 2008, 10:40 AM

none of these guys are the real deal,just fantasists who court attention.Any responsible gov. or otherwise would not allow any loose cannons.loose lips cost lives.

Yes TU and your two cents leads directly to a man who is trying to sell sci-fi as reality via DVDs and Books.

Even though there is, just recently, a DVD available it is very recent and is only 1 as far as I know. Prior to this there was 1 book by BJ Wolf which he assisted on which was with regard to the artifiacts on 'Mars' issue. This book was out prior to the 'hype' on the Television about the Mars issues and before it became a big phenom. I don't see this as an indication that this is a man 'trying to sell' anything. There are a few books out that OTHER PEOPLE have taken the liberty to write regarding his work, however.

You say there is no money in the UFO phenom? You are wrong again.

If that is what I said I apologize as it is NOT what I meant. That statement was made ONLY with regard to Mr. Burisch.


There are enough people in the World who want to believe that will keep people like DB in beer and chips

Here again you show your complete 'disdain' for this man. How can you say things about somebody that you have no clue about except what he has said and what others have said he has said? For your information Dan is in poor health and neither drinks beer nor consumes junk food. You are very welcome to continue doing so if that is the case, however.

Btw: Your assumption that I used the word ‘bub’ to describe a gender is wrong also. Bub=Buddy=comrade/chum/pal. Pal=Accomplice and I think you may be an accomplice of DB‘s.

Thank you, sincerely, for this lesson in English lit. I will most certainly keep it in mind! You are incorrect on the 'accomplice' thought, however. I'm just Jane Blow from up the street and my real name is TERI as I've said here. But other than that I'm NOBODY.

(Bill U) claiming insider info regarding UFO back engineering who cannot validate his claim.

You used Bob Lazar to discount Burisch. So, how has Bob Lazar validated his claims?

Your husband’s father also stated that by the year 2003 there will be major disclosures regarding these claims of his.
2003 has come and gone and no big disclosure.

He made a STATEMENT as to this POSSIBILITY. He did not say that it was a premonition or that the ET told him to say it. It was just a VOCALIZED THOUGHT he had. Things CHANGE. Nothing stays the same.

This claim of his is now verifiably false so why should I believe the other claims of his, like he was in on secret alien technology and he met an Alien named J-Rod?

YOU don't have to believe. Nobody HAS to believe. I repeat from my previous post, in response to callmecg, I do know this man and I believe him. I have no desire to believe this or anything else that is obscure. If this were so I'd believe in Billy Meier and Adamsky and the Easter Bunny!! As far as J-Rod that wasn't his name but a designation as to his 'race' of being and a little bit of research would readily provide this information.

Yes TU, I think you are biased in this case

Think as you wish. I respect your thought processes.

I think I have a pretty good idea of what the military is about and an even better idea of what the Intelligence Community would do if DB were telling the truth.

Did you ever serve in the Military? Were you ever around any military base or military people? Just curious. I served in the USMC from 1981 through 1984 and was raised by an Air Force enlisted Father who is now retired. DB says what he is ALLOWED to say. PERIOD. You and everybody else who INSISTS on VERIFIABLE EVIDENCE and says over and over again adnauseum, "Where's his PHD?" and "I KNOW what the Intelligence community would do if DB were actually telling the truth" have NO IDEA of how things work. I'm sorry and I'm not bashing you I'm simply stating a fact. There is NO VERIFIABLE anything because it is FORBIDDEN by the Intelligence community to provide any. CIVILIANS really need to get that through their thick Sheepish skulls. Dan Burisch and Bill Uhouse have only said what they are ALLOWED to say. PERIOD.

Imo, he would probably be arrested for breach of contract, considered a threat to National Security and ‘muzzled’ as you might put it

The SECRECY contract is a 15 year contract. Bill Uhouse AND Dan Burisch did not say anything before that time frame had elapsed and even than they only spoke out on what they were given the OK to speak out on. My husband worked for the Test Site in Civilian capacity as an X-Ray technician and his contract was the same. That 15 year time frame has long since elapsed so he can now speak about what he did and saw there. With a few exceptions which he does not even disclose to me.

TU, making statements like “There's not much more than the typical adolescent banter here (at AU)” is a flame and most of us adults know the reason for flaming like this is because the ‘flamer’ is trying to obfuscate facts with rhetoric. ~rore


I am afraid that from my perspective the comment as to 'adolescent banter' stands. It was not an intended flame but an indication of the obvious lack of knowledge and lack of true investigation which has been done on the part of those putting their thoughts into words here and making undo remarks about persons whom they have no idea about since they've simply sat in their armchairs and read a couple of snippets of information and formed a complete and total judgment as to character from it. The only obfuscation going on here is within each and every individual who refuses to understand what is told to them. You can check out the remarks I've made as to the Secrecy time frame. It is a FACT. You can check out other things as well but I've done my own research and, as adults, if you wish to do more than you need to do it yourselves. I have stated my opinion and each and every person here can do the same. No rhetoric. I think I've spoken clearly and since I'm an adult I've simply thought my words out carefully and do not know how to write them otherwise.

Let me attempt to put it simply this way. The public has been provided with all the information they are going to get for the time being. If SOME of it is misinformation than it is up to each individual to FIND the truth themselves by doing more research such as finding a 'common denominator' in the many stories that you hear. Find consistencies or non-consistencies and weed out what you feel is the mis-information. It is already being done by many serious investigators but if individuals want to KNOW than they must do the work. Sorry it doesn't come spoon fed. When disclosure comes, IF it does, it will have to be taken with 'prejudice' due to the exact issues we are all encountering here.

Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this forum. Once again, for the last time, I wish for each and every individual here to find what it is they're truly looking for.

PEACE

This post has been edited by Teri Uhouse: Aug 4 2008, 02:09 PM

TU posts: Did you ever serve in the Military? Were you ever around any military base or military people? Just curious.

Rore posts: Unlike you Teri, I hold my privacy dearly. I do not think it appropriate for me to tell anyone on an open forum too many details about my life.

To know whether or not I am familiar with the DoD will become apparent in my responses to other’s posts.

As an aside, I have met plenty of military personnel with an IQ of less than 90 and an imagination that is astounding. I don’t deride them for this, it is just a fact.
Sooo … Someone telling me they were in the military doesn’t really tell me much.
===============

TU posts: (You Rore are saying ) I KNOW what the Intelligence community would do if DB were actually telling the truth" have NO IDEA of how things work. I'm sorry and I'm not bashing you I'm simply stating a fact.

Rore posts: I really hate it when people misquote me Teri. I said I have a really good idea what the Intelligence Community would do.

I have a very good idea of how these things work.

A single enlistment in the Corps hardly makes you an expert hey?
============
Rore posts: Your husband’s father also stated that by the year 2003 there will be major disclosures regarding these claims of his.
2003 has come and gone and no big disclosure.

TU posts: He made a STATEMENT as to this POSSIBILITY.

Rore posts: There ya go again TU. It was a statement of fact not possibility.
Read the interview Linda had with him in 2002 or so. Bill said, and I quote, “by 2003, most of this stuff will be out for everybody to look at.” He was talking about the reversed engineered alien tech stuff.

Bullshit right?

What’s not BS is that this claim of his is verifiably false, ya know?

I don’t make things up as I go along.
====================
TU posts: It was not an intended flame but an indication of the obvious lack of knowledge…

Rore posts: Like your lack of knowledge regarding what your father-in-law said to Linda?
===================
TU posts: CIVILIANS really need to get that through their thick Sheepish skulls.

Rore posts: Geeze TU, you spent one enlistment in the military?
You are what we may call a one hit wonder. You go into the corps for a 3-4 year enlistment, come out and tell everyone how bad you are and you know all about how the military works… I don’t think so. There’s more to it than that. (btw: I commend you for making that commitment)

Thank you rore for speaking your mind and I can see that it is a good one.

TU posts: (You Rore are saying ) I KNOW what the Intelligence community would do if DB were actually telling the truth" have NO IDEA of how things work. I'm sorry and I'm not bashing you I'm simply stating a fact.


It was not intended to 'misquote' you but if you will go back and read again you will see that it was: You and everybody else: which was NOT a direct quote from you or directed towards you specifically. But you are right and I'll be more careful.

Rore posts: Unlike you Teri, I hold my privacy dearly. I do not think it appropriate for me to tell anyone on an open forum too many details about my life

I can respect that but that also 'clears' you from owning up to many issues. I also use my name while you use a pseudonym. I prefer to OWN my words but it's typical of people to not want to do that to often, especially on forums such as this. Fear is normal..... and then there's this; People who 'hold their privacy' dearly yet pry into others private lives in an effort to seek the 'Truth'? Perhaps Truth only follows the same?

To know whether or not I am familiar with the DoD will become apparent in my responses to other’s posts.

I never suggested this nor did I ask it. I NEVER professed ANY knowledge of the DoD. I was a Heavy Equipment Operator and that was 22 years ago! I simply said that I understand how things are done in Military venues. I am also aware of the 15 year silence agreement through my husband and than doing research to verify it.

A single enlistment in the Corps hardly makes you an expert hey?

INDEED this is a true statement but I never suggested that. That is your suggestion.

As an aside, I have met plenty of military personnel with an IQ of less than 90 and an imagination that is astounding. I don’t deride them for this, it is just a fact.

What branch of the service are you talking about? I had to take a multitude of tests to be accepted into the Marine Corps and one of them was an IQ test. 90 is BELOW average and WAS NOT ACCEPTED, let alone lower than that. At least not 20 years ago. So somebody was more than likely pulling your leg! Your facts are very likely 'flawed' my dear. And just for 'trivia' Dan Burisch is up around 185 or 190! It's obvious when speak to him in person. (Average IQ is 100 - 110)

Rore posts: Like your lack of knowledge regarding what your father-in-law said to Linda?

For the record, Bill Uhouse NEVER spoke to Linda Howe. She took an interview that was done by Bill Hamilton and called it her own. That's her thing I'm afraid. But she's good at compiling things all in one place, albeit they are usually not her own things. And as to the comment which I know about and have already explained previously; “by 2003, most of this stuff will be out for everybody to look at.” if you truly KNOW the Military (DoD) or etc. than you will know that what they say is going to happen tomorrow may not actually HAPPEN tomorrow, or the next day for that matter. I REPEAT, THINGS CHANGE especially in Government work. That does not make this statement or suggestion a blatant LIE. And the fact that you attribute this to Linda Howe instead of it's true source is an indicator of how information get's misconstrued and mistranslated. The lack of knowledge is in your court, I'm afraid.

Rore posts: Geeze TU, you spent one enlistment in the military?
You are what we may call a one hit wonder. You go into the corps for a 3-4 year enlistment, come out and tell everyone how bad you are and you know all about how the military works… I don’t think so. There’s more to it than that.

You have a knack for reading into things. I never suggested to anybody how BAD I AM! Come on! I DO know how the military works because I was BORN into it. I was a G.I. brat my entire life until I graduated and went into the Corps myself. I NEVER indicated any superiority in any way. It was simply an indication of knowledge that is not often understood by those who have never been within the Military spectrum. That includes the knowledge of "Need to Know" which includes what individuals CAN and CANNOT say without being punished and/or eliminated. Just because individuals like Philip Schneider DIED for the cause doesn't mean that others now wish to follow in his footsteps.

I Thank you for the commendation.

I have to say that I'd intended NOT to post here any more but you seem to have a good mind so maybe I'll stay around. Besides, seems to me as if you are doing some information fishing and I have just given you a bit more to go on. Maybe yes, maybe no.

TU posts: For the record, Bill Uhouse NEVER spoke to Linda Howe. She took an interview that was done by Bill Hamilton and called it her own.
=============
Rore posts: Thanks for bringing that to light because it now leads us to this:

Not an interview but a part of the Disclosure Project Statement by Bill Uhouse as transcribed by Linda and posted on the web?
( http://www.boomspeed.com/joseph2/J-Rod3.htm )
http://www.wachadoo.com/forum/marine-veter...p;sk=t&sd=a

Is the below excerpt from the Disclosure Project Statement by Bill Uhouse accurate?

“And, like I told you gentlemen earlier - that by 2003, most of this stuff (Reversed engineered alien tech etc ~rore) will be out for everybody to look at. Maybe not the way that everybody expects it, but in some manner they determine appropriate to show everybody. You know, a big surprise.”

Surprise TU. It Never Happened. Or are you telling us Bill never made that statement and Linda is promoting a journalistic hoax?
========================

TU posts: 90 is BELOW average and WAS NOT ACCEPTED’
Your facts are very likely 'flawed' my dear.

Rore posts: Your statement that a person cannot get i