Thread: Implanted Homing Device.

I think it would be scarier to find that it's our fellow man doing implants than aliens looking for information, personally..

I agree with soul-drifter. The implants are for montior are body grow and development. I feel I am a test subject being montitored. Each month, right before my period, this guy wants to get together and have sexual relation. I always felt he was having sex with me so he could implant something. I can never prove it or even know how to prove it without being called crazy. This is the only time he will be with me sexually. Maybe the implants are discarded with my period and a new one is inserted each month. Weird things have been happening around me as well as people acting so out of the character. I have also wittnessed a few things that I can not explain. I have been trying to find someone to help me investigate and look at photos I have with objects in them. The objects could be normal human objects but I would feel better knowing that they are human.

new message

All this talk of implants sound suspect to flaws. The Grays for example have nanotechnology. They can reduce a full biomonitoring implant to the size of a dust particle and implant it in the bones. Powered by your body.

It would be highly questionable why they would put something in our bodies that was so easily findable. Not to mention they have a full database of humans including nearly all variations and with just about everything you could want to know. Why study the human body with probes and implants to find out what they already know or can find out with a simple autopsy? The only thing I can think of is to monitor not the body at all. But what the person is doing, saying, hearing, seeing and so on.

It could be a way to monitor humans without operatives being on Earth. Ones life could basically be a TV show that keeps them up to date with what is going on here in Earth.

But them again, I made all that up while reading this thread. I don't know of this being the case. I am just putting forward an idea.

Originally posted by SOUL-DRIFTER;348049
[b]They could be devices that rapidly self-destruct, once tampered with, by degrading to a point that it can not be recognized as anything unusual by us.
There are many possibilities...are there not?

That is actually possible with current technology. Scientists have been concerned because carbon nanotubes had the potential in laboratory experiments to be accidentally ingested by fish (this was an environmental impact study in response to a U.S. Congressional request). The nanotubes would collect in the brains of the fish causing lesions and death. Some wanted to shut down nanotechnology all-together, and this was a huge concern not only because of the value of nanotubes to materials science, but also the impact on the potential use of buckminster fullerines in medical technology. They therefore began research into the feasibility of creating nanotubes that would biodegrade, and my understanding is that this was accomplished.

If you set environmental parameters of your nanotechnology, you could theoretically design it so that it would degrade outside a particular range of temperature (for example, once removed from the body, it would degrade at less than body temperature) as with some memory-shape polymers that are being explored as an alternative to surgical stitches; or that would decay on contact or loss of contact with a certain element, compound etc.

I think it's entirely possible, even with current human technologies, to design an implant that would decay outside the body.

I think nanotech is overkill for what these implants are supposed to be doing. Think of them as a resource friendly method ofd tracking without having to create and maintain all those nanobots in all those people. A slab of magnetic metal, powered by bio-electric impulses from our nervous systems, pumping out a low level, but detectable em field. Why waste nanobots on something so simple? It's like drilling a hole in a piece of wood with a military grade laser when a hand drill would do just as well.

My point was about biodegradability of materials, in response to a question about why so few people have brought forward identifiable implants, and in response to a comment by SD that the implants might be designed to self-destruct. My point therefore, was that this is credible scenario because such technologies exist. I was not suggesting that aliens use nanotechnological implants, and no such suggestion exists in my post. My post is entirely about HUMAN technology.