|
|
|
Thanks SD these are the sorts of reports I find interesting, more so than YouTube vidios.
As with any ridicules skeptic you pick and choose certain parts of the evidence while ignoring the rest. The trace evidence is NOT limited to rings. Shows what little you know and that you do not take the time to research. Then make comments like "Has anyone here looked at the evidence against the so-called ufo invasion? "
Then make proclamations ..."are no visitations...that this is all just a spot of fun on many peoples parts." It really demonstrates to me and others just how ignorant of the subject you are or you are just trying to see if you can get people stirred up. Like I said believe what you want. You can also believe the world is still flat or than man never went to the moon. Those would be just as silly, but what ever.
Any sane person that looks at all the evidence and has spoken to people(witnesses) at the very least should consider the visitation idea, as very possible. To say it just plain doesn't and never happened is just plain nutty.
In search of the real truth.
Bill, gotta point out, the lack of a rational explanation currently known, doesn't mean that explanation x is automatically correct...
It's like, I could throw out that how does he know they were aliens, and not inter-dimensional travellers.
A lack of evidence for something does not automatically mean it's incorrect, unless there is evidence in the opposite direction.
*whistles slowly*
But yeah, I don't really know enough about the case to make much comment on it, except about the polygraphs. I'll read up more details when I can. =)
I simply do not know what is true in this area, and what pisses me off is people claiming with absolute certainty that they KNOW what is correct.
I see it on both ends of the debate too.
Believers proudly touting that they 100% believe in visitation, and insulting those who don't. No leeway to accept actual logical explanations, or anything.
And those who think all the believers have some sort of mental deficiency... Those who constantly try to shove square pegs into round holes in an attempt to explain some things which, given the current information, cant be explained.
All of them irritate me.
Every one of them.
It turns this subject into a flame war.
Crazed believers giving not only UFOlogy a bad name, but every site they plague. Places like YouTube serve as breeding pits for them...
Or, pseudo-sceptics, who make every believer weary of science, causing a big gap in the basic knowledge of a lot of areas of it... Causing even more conspiracies due to ignorance.
AAARRRRRRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGG!
There are quite a few logical and scientific reasons why alien visitation is near impossible.
And there are some reports which seem to back up the idea that visitation does occur.
There.
Now that's out.
Lets all get along. =)
Last edited by Xeno; 04-04-2011 at 05:56 PM.
Ok i agree but i was only stating the facts that were told to the authorities to the poster i was quoting that too.
He was saying about rational explanation i was telling him what was stated about the case, i never cast his opinion away, he was asking for evidence and i provided him with a snippet.
I never have said this is fact and this isn't. I have never said on this forum that i am right and that person is wrong.
Np :P
*I feel a need to update my description of the irritating ones... As to not accidentally piss people off.
People who defend every single alien case with zeal...Or, particular ones with the inability to accept any flaw, no matter how well it's explained.
Like what happened in the Meier thread...
Bookmarks