If anyone has a better sight than YouTube for UFO video I all ears!
|
|
|
I'm going to ask again,dose anyone know about alien races and their agenda?Anything else you talk about is off the subject! I have submitted a great video,what do you have to offer to enlighten us?
If anyone has a better sight than YouTube for UFO video I all ears!
Personally I back David Jacobs integration program theory. I know a lot of people on this board have a different point of view but this is the one that works for me. Check out the videos below. If you like them he has a great book called The Threat and another one called Sight Unseen which are the two best books ever written on alien abduction in my opinion.
part1
part2
Last edited by SheerTerror; 10-23-2011 at 07:15 PM.
I believe that species of aliens that are like the Grays or like the Nordics may exist, and I believe that hybrids may be possible...but I DON'T back Jacobs's integration/infiltration theory for several reasons.
I don't back Jacobs's theory partly because he thinks that all Nordic-like aliens are really Gray hybrids, and he doesn't believe in any benevolent aliens...which is a conclusion without any solid evidence backing it up. I disagree with that theory because there is a strong possibility that some human-like "Nordic" alien races that may exist are actually unrelated to the Grays and unaffiliated with them. Jacobs seems to think that there are only Grays, Insectoids and Hybrids, and that ALL of them are bad.
It's a logical fallacy to think there are only bad aliens out there and that there are only Grays, Insectoids and Hybrid aliens in the universe if there are any aliens at all, when the universe could in fact be full of thousands of millions of intelligent alien races.
In fact, in a universe as big as this one, some of the extrasolar species that could exist may be just like the so-called "Nordic" Space Brothers, and be aliens that look and act just like us without having to be Gray/human hybrids. Jacobs doesn't even consider that possibility.
Another reason why I don't back Jacobs's theory is because of the unethical and unscientific methods he used to reach that theory, and because he doesn't allow for any alternative explanations (like the psychosocial hypothesis) to be explored in explaining the abduction phenomenon.
how can anyone 'enlighten' you on a subject that does not, at this time, have any solid facts?
now if you want to do some research because you are really interested in the subject, i suggest checking out soul-drifter's threads under 'ufos'; i believe he has one thread that actually says 'ufo-nauts; the missions, agendas'; stories based on personal experience.
in order to actually know anyone or anything's 'agenda' you have to be able to discern the facts, which is impossible at this time. a breeding program, a grand 'experiment' or just meddlesome interference...how the heck would we know? i am sure that some have ideas...but that's all they are, ideas, and remember, any information gleamed by personal experience with the visitors is subject to being tainted by screen memories...so it's kind of a 'crap shoot' as to what they really want imo...
Some people claim to know what is going on but can't provide proof. It is all on what you choose to believe.
IMO the agenda is a well guarded secret and not for human eyes.
Very funny, Scotty. Now beam down my clothes.
Smoke and mirrors................
.................m Htp nfr wrt..........................
well my point of view on aliens is that they are angels and some are good and some are bad. I think that the fallen angels are the ones that we have to watch out for. Here is a website I was just reading, it describes what I believe about aliens and why.
UFOs - Demonic Deception?
People seem not to see that their opinion of the world is also a confession of character.
-Ralph Waldo Emerson
Bookmarks