Thread: A floating object spotted during hurricane Irene.

It wouldn't make a goddamn if it was a real picture or video. cause every cynic and skeptic would scream from the top of their dumbass lungs it was cgi or fake Period

Originally Posted by journey

Because the pixelation around the object match with the background perfectly.
When an object is inserted in a image, there are anomalies in pixelation around the object.

However. About the distance and size of the object, you might be right, it is hard for me to provide an answer.

And every good cgi artist knows this very well.
Thats why there are cgi tools that duplicate this very well, if one can afford the better graphics tools, and knows how to use them with skill.
One that does this very well is a clone tool that transfers the pixelation around real objects like birds to the inserted one.

Originally Posted by seen'um

It wouldn't make a goddamn if it was a real picture or video. cause every cynic and skeptic would scream from the top of their dumbass lungs it was cgi or fake Period

That is correct.
Because only a dumbass makes assumptions of aliens.
Especially over something that dumbasses fake to convince others of what they believe but cannot prove.

Thats why it is going to take real physical proof to convince anyone who has more than two cents worth of common sense.
That would not be necesary if humans could always be trusted.
Trusted to actually fully understand and be candid about everything they see.
And trusted not to fake or embellish what they don't see.

Since we are all dumbasses, I chose to be the one with at least 10 cents worth of common sense.

I don't require the stinking truth or have to have a alien spaceship crash on my head to believe. I've seen them with my own eyes. That's good enough for me.

Originally Posted by bart5050

And every good cgi artist knows this very well.
Thats why there are cgi tools that duplicate this very well, if one can afford the better graphics tools, and knows how to use them with skill.
One that does this very well is a clone tool that transfers the pixelation around real objects like birds to the inserted one.

Yup. It's incredibly easy to do...
And price isn't much of an issue, since most owned personal copies of Photoshop are likely pirated, and even then, GIMP has pretty much most of the tools photoshop does, just without the price tag.

The pixelization issue means squat, journey. It'll take anyone who has half a clue on how to use photoshop 5 minutes to replicate the "pixelisation" match you mentioned... 10 minutes max, and that's only if there's a massive quality difference between the original and the thing being inserted into the image.

Originally Posted by seen'um

I don't require the stinking truth or have to have a alien spaceship crash on my head to believe. I've seen them with my own eyes. That's good enough for me.

Your personal reality is fine, and may very well be true.
It takes more than this to convince the world at large.

Can you describe exactly what you saw?
How far away was it?
For how long did you observe it?
What behaviors can you describe?
Time of day, light and weather conditions?
Approximate date, and location?
Shape, details, and motion?

I am sure many here would be interested.
And I am not out to debunk or judge.
If no one had ever seen anything that convinced them, this forum wouldn't exist.

Originally Posted by Xeno

Yup. It's incredibly easy to do...
And price isn't much of an issue, since most owned personal copies of Photoshop are likely pirated, and even then, GIMP has pretty much most of the tools photoshop does, just without the price tag.

I really like the Gimp lol...

Originally Posted by bart5050

Your personal reality is fine, and may very well be true.
It takes more than this to convince the world at large.

Can you describe exactly what you saw?
How far away was it?
For how long did you observe it?
What behaviors can you describe?
Time of day, light and weather conditions?
Approximate date, and location?
Shape, details, and motion?

I am sure many here would be interested.
And I am not out to debunk or judge.
If no one had ever seen anything that convinced them, this forum wouldn't exist.

my sighting
they were bout a half a mile away when they stop and hovered. the craft were a bright light blue in color and i didn't see port holes or any protruding top more like a discus they use in track and field only fatter/ thicker in the center.

Originally Posted by journey

So, you can take thousands of photos to a real ufo passing by, but it will be fake just because they did not want to land and start negotiations......Interesting!

Journey, friend, c'mon, we've all been together long enough to know that photo's of ufo's are proof of ufos, but ufos themselves are not proof of alien visitation of earth.

Unidentified Flying Object is not(should not be) a synonym for Inter Galactic Spacecraft

Originally Posted by Xeno

Yup. It's incredibly easy to do...
And price isn't much of an issue, since most owned personal copies of Photoshop are likely pirated, and even then, GIMP has pretty much most of the tools photoshop does, just without the price tag.

The pixelization issue means squat, journey. It'll take anyone who has half a clue on how to use photoshop 5 minutes to replicate the "pixelisation" match you mentioned... 10 minutes max, and that's only if there's a massive quality difference between the original and the thing being inserted into the image.

I have never assured the pics are from a real UFO, I have my reasons to believe these pictures are not precisely authentic, but not for any of the reason stated by Bart.
But one thing I can say for sure, they are not edited, photoshoped or anything.

Besides, there are ways to prove if an image has been manipulated after being taken, by reading the file metadata or something named like this.

My point is to prove how easy is to discard any potential evidence or proof, just because the 90% of alleged evidence is fake. and not even bother to analize it seriously.

Bart, I don´t think any testimony will convice you until you see them with your own eyes.

In my personal experience I have witnessed of events that have no reasonal explanation, including the sighting of two large flying objects at least 300 mts away of me and other witnesses, who were perfectly identified as craft made by no human technology.

So, I do not need the evidence you are looking for, I know they exist and this phenomena is real.

However, I can´t be more agree with you of the large amount of dumbasses looking for their 5 minutes of fame or just looking to deceive other people.